Yes in async mode the quorum still has to be reached, so if the quorum is not
reached your value is overriden.
So depending on your setup both write but have no guarantee that it will stay
written.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
OrientDB
Uffe we had some issues with distributed mode with 2.0.5 which have
apparently been fixed in the latest version of the code. Given the defect
density thus far I am wary but perhaps 2.0.6 will work for you when it is
released. It is easy to get the code and build it yourself, use the 2.0.x
Jelastic are the closest you get. They are not a specialist provider but
they are as close as you get to PaaS for orientdb. Note that they only
support 1.7.x because 2.0.x is not stable enough.
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 at 12:16:59 AM UTC+11, Colin wrote:
Hi Rajesh,
Are you thinking
Here is my set up: orientdb running in a docker container on an AWS server
in Frankfurt, and a similar container on AWS in Sydney. IPSEC tunneling
between them. My docker file looks like this:
FROM dockerfile/java:oracle-java8
MAINTAINER Simon Gemmell
# Update the default application
For 2) google it shows:
https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/wiki/DB-Server
For 3) suggest you try google it. Try keywords orientdb performance. It is
there.
On Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 9:10:37 PM UTC+11, Hiren Dutta wrote:
I am new to Orient DB using OrientDB Server v2.0.1.
I
+11, Simon Gemmell wrote:
Hello, we find that we can do 15,000 in 6 seconds or so, the orientdb guys
were able to get it down to 2-3 seconds. If you've got an email address I
can forward you their code perhaps tease apart how they did it. Also, if
you've got a quorum of 2 then obviously it has
Hello, we find that we can do 15,000 in 6 seconds or so, the orientdb guys
were able to get it down to 2-3 seconds. If you've got an email address I
can forward you their code perhaps tease apart how they did it. Also, if
you've got a quorum of 2 then obviously it has to wait for the 2nd one to
Hey guys, rc package doesn't come with lucene in the libs folder. Don't
know if this was a mistake or intentional.
On Thursday, December 18, 2014 9:49:29 AM UTC+11, Lvc@ wrote:
London, December 17, 2014
Orient Technologies has released *OrientDB 2.0-rc1* as the first Release
Candidate
Yes, should have done so already as it is annoying, created ticket #3100
(https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/issues/3100)
On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 9:50:36 AM UTC+11, Simon L wrote:
This seems like an important issue.
Maybe we should open a Issue ticket on GitHub?
Does it still occur in 2.0-M3? Lets hope it was a (fixed) bug in 2.0-M2...
On Friday, November 14, 2014 3:36:24 PM UTC+11, yi...@icm-consulting.com.au
wrote:
Hi,
We've encountered an issue where we're getting
ConcurrentModificationException when committing a transaction. The details
are
Hi,
We are storing a tree structure using a LinkList for the children. We need
it to be LinkList (as opposed to EmbeddedLinkList) because the children are
referenced directly from other parts of the system. I can see from the
examples that you can quite easily create a tree of EmbeddedLinkList
11 matches
Mail list logo
