RE: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver

2001-02-03 Thread Allen Fogleson
do? After all maybe I am being dense and missing something. :) Al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Schnitzer Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 12:15 AM To: Orion-Interest Subject: RE: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver While

Re: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver

2001-01-31 Thread Burr Sutter
, 2001 9:28 PM Subject: Re: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver Jeff, I disagree. Part of the benefit of a DataSource is that it can abstract the actual driver or database being used. If I can ask a DataSource for a database connection and not have to care about which client-side driver

Re: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver

2001-01-30 Thread Tom Mitchell
know you're going to need the classes anyways, package them with the client. Jeff -Original Message- From: Tom Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 9:08 AM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver Again, thanks

RE: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver

2001-01-30 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
the class files is slow anyways :-) :-) :-) Jeff -Original Message- From: Tom Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 6:29 PM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Re: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver Jeff, I disagree. Part of the benefit of a DataSource