I am using 1.3.1_02 and SwiftMQ 3.0 beta.
--- Geoff Soutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. Strange.
I'm definitely using 1.5.4, you can see it in the console output I
included below. I tried doing an autoupdate and trying it again, made no
difference. I even did a recursive diff against
Also, I just tested the ATM as per Magnus' suggestion and it worked there as well.
Have you tried
it with SwiftMQ 3.0 (I know they just got rid of their free licenses)? I will try it
later with
version 2.x.
Cheers
Ray
--- Ray Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using 1.3.1_02 and SwiftMQ
For the record,
in our tests we were using both 1.3.1_02 and 1.4.0_b92 together with
Swift 2.1.3
WR
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] För Ray Harrison
Skickat: den 20 februari 2002 13:40
Till: Orion-Interest
Ämne: RE: (repost) FW: A word of
Argh. Mailing lists that are not reliable annoy the out of me.
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Soutter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2002 9:32 AM
To: 'Orion-Interest'
Subject: RE: A word of warning: SwiftMQ and Resource providers.
Hi Magnus,
All I did was
Interesting - I *don't* get that error any longer with 1.5.4, though I did with 1.5.3.
--- Geoff Soutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Argh. Mailing lists that are not reliable annoy the out of me.
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Soutter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 19
Hmm. Strange.
I'm definitely using 1.5.4, you can see it in the console output I
included below. I tried doing an autoupdate and trying it again, made no
difference. I even did a recursive diff against the .zip version and the
autoupdate version and they are identical (despite the fact
