Hello Patrick,
the patch is fine, anyway!
Regarding differences between blob and string when it comes to compare
On 14 Jul 2014, at 20:10, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>> My first question would be why PHOTO was defined "string" here, not "blob"?
>
> I changed that in this commit:
>
> [...]
>
> Unf
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 18:15 +0200, Lukas Zeller wrote:
> Hello Patrick,
>
> On 11 Jul 2014, at 15:27, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>
> > I'm currently investigating why a comparison of two PHOTO fields of
> > different length returns "field equal". PHOTO is defined as:
> >
> > > merge="fillempty"/
Hello Patrick,
On 11 Jul 2014, at 15:27, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> I'm currently investigating why a comparison of two PHOTO fields of
> different length returns "field equal". PHOTO is defined as:
>
>
My first question would be why PHOTO was defined "string" here, not "blob"?
> I think the
Hello!
I'm currently investigating why a comparison of two PHOTO fields of
different length returns "field equal". PHOTO is defined as:
I think the specific situation is that the two values contain a null
byte somewhere in the middle, and the part before that is equal.
I think the follow
