Re: [Oscar-devel] opkgc documentation

2007-07-03 Thread Michael Edwards
Well, one option is to make it in the current, better documented package format and convert it to the new format with a script which was written to convert the existing packages (also undocumented). As the documentation guy, I apologize, but I have not gotten around to looking at the documentation

[Oscar-devel] opkgc documentation

2007-07-03 Thread Stuart Archibald
Dear all, I have just had a quick word with bernardl on IRC and he said to bring to your attention that I feel that there are some documentation/clarity issues to do with OPKGC. I am struggling and want people to know why so things can be made better. I have been plodding along with MPITB (MPI T

Re: [Oscar-devel] Qt Configurator?

2007-07-03 Thread Michael Edwards
A new gui is good :) I was just wondering if the gui changes were opkg motivated, which it appears they are not. Just being nosy. On 7/3/07, Geoffroy Vallée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What do you mean by "interaction with opkg"? Typically the current GUI does not match our needs, especially w

Re: [Oscar-devel] Qt Configurator?

2007-07-03 Thread Geoffroy Vallée
What do you mean by "interaction with opkg"? Typically the current GUI does not match our needs, especially when using virtual clusters. That's the main reason why we are working on a new GUI. Le lundi 2 juillet 2007 14:10, Michael Edwards a écrit : > Out of curriosity, is the goal of this Qt re