Olivier,
It is in (r9459).
Thanks for your contribution!
- Mail original -
De: "LAHAYE Olivier"
À: oscar-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé: Mercredi 8 Août 2012 08:20:49
Objet: [Oscar-devel] oscar-packager fix
Hi,
Here is a fix for the following things:
1/ when buildin
Hi Olivier,
Great work you doing . i tested OSCAR on Cent OS 5.5. but after i busy in
some other work..
You doing great job to port OSCAR to Current Release. helping to
maintainer.
Laxman Singh
Lnmiit.ac.in
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:50 PM, LAHAYE Olivier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a fix for t
Hi,
Here is a fix for the following things:
1/ when building packages like ganglia, don't forget to move rpms like
lib64ganglia-...-x86_64.rpm (rpm whith a name that doesn't start with the
source package name (ganglia in this case).
2/ Update Changelog
3/ Fixes to spec files (see spec file cha
Olivier,
I do not agree with your patches: based on the current semantic, all the
packages should start with the name described by the configuration file: it
creates a name space and therefore everything should fit within it. If not,
there is a mistake somewhere.
Moreover, if you had issues wi
Hi,
There is a problem in build_package and Packager.pm that prevents moving all
generated rpms into $PKGDEST
In fact the cp and mv command are doing $cmd $pkg*rpm $dest
this means that all generated rpms that have a name that does not start with
$pkg are ignored.
I felt into that trying to up
