Re: [osg-users] Skipping nodes in serialization

2011-09-07 Thread Chris Denham
I was pondering this the other day and it occurred to me that the problem boiled down to the fact that some (if not all) serializers do not write via a subclass of NodeVisitor, and hence are unaffected by nodemasks. I wondered if you could simply make your node so it is ONLY visible to

Re: [osg-users] Skipping nodes in serialization

2011-09-06 Thread Thrall, Bryan
Robert Osfield wrote on 2011-09-05: There isn't a scheme for missing nodes during serialization. On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Joel Graff pair_o_gra...@comcast.net wrote: Hi, I have a graph that I serialize with a simple call to osgDB::writeNodeFile(), but it contains a node that is

Re: [osg-users] Skipping nodes in serialization

2011-09-06 Thread Jeremy Moles
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 13:01 +0200, Joel Graff wrote: Hi, I have a graph that I serialize with a simple call to osgDB::writeNodeFile(), but it contains a node that is auto-generated when the application starts. Is there a way to exclude that node from serialization? I'm familiar with

Re: [osg-users] Skipping nodes in serialization

2011-09-05 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Joel, There isn't a scheme for missing nodes during serialization. Robert. On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Joel Graff pair_o_gra...@comcast.net wrote: Hi, I have a graph that I serialize with a simple call to osgDB::writeNodeFile(), but it contains a node that is auto-generated when

[osg-users] Skipping nodes in serialization

2011-09-03 Thread Joel Graff
Hi, I have a graph that I serialize with a simple call to osgDB::writeNodeFile(), but it contains a node that is auto-generated when the application starts. Is there a way to exclude that node from serialization? I'm familiar with the setNodeMask() / setTraversalMask() mechanism used in