Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions]osgParticle ParticleSystemandModularEmitterin different coordinate systems

Hi, Sorry to have dropped this on the floor; I missed your response below. I took a look at your examples, especially the one that is now broken. I see that what you were doing is quite similar to what the September patch does: construct a frame of reference for the ModularEmitter that is relative

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions]osgParticle ParticleSystemandModularEmitterin different coordinate systems

So, where does that leave us? What breaks by reverting the September changes on ModularEmitter.cpp? Do you have an example of your usage? Traversing the hierarchy to get double precision world matrices and applying it to single precision particle systems causes precision problems for my usage.

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] osgParticle ParticleSystemandModularEmitterin different coordinate systems

Jolley, Thomas P wrote: > Hi Robert, > > I've moved this discussion over to osg-users. > > Attached are some examples that should show the precision problem I'm running > into. There are 4 osg files. The first one, particle.osg, is just a plain > particle effect emmitting smoke. The other os

Re: [osg-users] [osg-submissions] osgParticle ParticleSystemandModularEmitterin different coordinate systems

Hi Robert, I've moved this discussion over to osg-users. Attached are some examples that should show the precision problem I'm running into. There are 4 osg files. The first one, particle.osg, is just a plain particle effect emmitting smoke. The other osg files are based on this model. The