Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-29 Thread Sukender
Hi Robert, hi all, Err... about CDash, is there any preference of type (nightly, continuous, experimental)? I'm not used to CDash and don't really know the differences (if there is any). And are there things I should know about it, or about sumbitting a build? Thanks. Sukender PVLE -

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-29 Thread Alberto Luaces
Hi Sukender, El Jueves 29 Enero 2009ES 13:58:49 Sukender escribió: Err... about CDash, is there any preference of type (nightly, continuous, experimental)? I'm not used to CDash and don't really know the differences (if there is any). And are there things I should know about it, or about

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-29 Thread Sukender
Thanks! However, I do compile manually (no scheduled tasks). I think nightly will do it. :) Sukender PVLE - Lightweight cross-platform game engine - http://pvle.sourceforge.net/ Le Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:14:10 +0100, Alberto Luaces alua...@udc.es a écrit: Hi Sukender, El Jueves 29 Enero

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-29 Thread Sukender
Actually, experimental should be better since it is said that It can be usefull, but maybe only for testing purposes or reporting specific issues maybe... which is what I do: I complile just for a specific test. Sukender PVLE - Lightweight cross-platform game engine -

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-28 Thread Paul Martz
Hi Robert -- As we approach 2.8, do you have a list of new features added post-2.6? This would help direct my testing at recently-modified or recently-added functionality. Thanks, Paul Martz Skew Matrix Software LLC http://www.skew-matrix.com +1 303 859 9466

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-28 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Paul, On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Paul Martz pma...@skew-matrix.com wrote: Hi Robert -- As we approach 2.8, do you have a list of new features added post-2.6? This would help direct my testing at recently-modified or recently-added functionality. I don't have a list yet, once 2.7.9 is

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Paul Fotheringham
--- On Fri, 23/1/09, Robert Osfield robert.osfi...@gmail.com wrote: snip I would very much like for us to get the OSG binaries sorted out for this OSG-2.8, both for platforms like Windows and OSX, and for linux, in particular knocking on the Linux distro doors to get OSG-2.8 in the up

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Paul, On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Paul Fotheringham osg_u...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: I'm currently teaching myself how to build rpms. Would that be of any use for you? It would. There is a message of Mattias, on the thread about LIB_POSTFIX, which mentions how to create rpms using CPack,

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Paul Fotheringham
--- On Tue, 27/1/09, Robert Osfield robert.osfi...@gmail.com wrote: From: Robert Osfield robert.osfi...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8 To: osg_u...@yahoo.co.uk, OpenSceneGraph Users osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org Date: Tuesday, 27 January

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi All, I've just updated the BugResolution page on the wiki for the work on getting ready for 2.8. The page can be found at: http://www.openscenegraph.org/projects/osg/wiki/Community/Tasks/BugResolution If have have bugs that exist in svn trunk + 2.7.x then please added them into this

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Art Tevs
Hi Robert, why making the life harder than it already is :) I mean making Wiki for Bug resolutions, which can be done with the Ticket system as well. I think using tickets will be an easier way than using the wiki. You only have to connect the ticket system with the mailing list and acitvate

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Art, I must admit I'm not familiar with the Ticket system. I use Tracs in a very basic way. Perhaps it's time to learn... I am rather wary of using instigating a bug tracking system as sometimes they can be misused for feature request, and can create a barrier in direct communication. I

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Jean-Sébastien Guay
Hi Robert, I've just updated the BugResolution page on the wiki for the work on getting ready for 2.8. The page can be found at: http://www.openscenegraph.org/projects/osg/wiki/Community/Tasks/BugResolution Just wondering, I noticed you placed the osgShadow circular reference issue in

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Paul Melis
Robert Osfield wrote: I must admit I'm not familiar with the Ticket system. I use Tracs in a very basic way. Perhaps it's time to learn... I don't think there is much difference between Trac's tickets and what you find in a regular (bug) tracking system, such as Bugzilla or Roundup. The

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Jean-Sébastien Guay
Hi Robert, Just wondering, I noticed you placed the osgShadow circular reference issue in the Recently Fixed bugs category, but the fix has not been checked in yet. Sorry about that, just got your other message. J-S -- __ Jean-Sebastien

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi JS, On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Jean-Sébastien Guay jean-sebastien.g...@cm-labs.com wrote: Just wondering, I noticed you placed the osgShadow circular reference issue in the Recently Fixed bugs category, but the fix has not been checked in yet. Should it be moved back to Should resolve

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Paul Melis
Robert Osfield wrote: Hi JS, On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Jean-Sébastien Guay jean-sebastien.g...@cm-labs.com wrote: Just wondering, I noticed you placed the osgShadow circular reference issue in the Recently Fixed bugs category, but the fix has not been checked in yet. Should it be

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Paul, On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Paul Melis p...@science.uva.nl wrote: I am rather wary of using instigating a bug tracking system as sometimes they can be misused for feature request, and can create a barrier in direct communication. I got burned by bug tracking systems in the

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Jan Ciger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Osfield wrote: Hi Art, I must admit I'm not familiar with the Ticket system. I use Tracs in a very basic way. Perhaps it's time to learn... I am rather wary of using instigating a bug tracking system as sometimes they can be

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Jean-Sébastien Guay
Hi Paul, I added the revision numbers for the fixed bugs. Trac at its finest :) Yep, very nice :-) J-S -- __ Jean-Sebastien Guayjean-sebastien.g...@cm-labs.com http://www.cm-labs.com/

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Paul Melis
Robert Osfield wrote: Hi All, I've just updated the BugResolution page on the wiki for the work on getting ready for 2.8. The page can be found at: http://www.openscenegraph.org/projects/osg/wiki/Community/Tasks/BugResolution If have have bugs that exist in svn trunk + 2.7.x then please

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Osfield
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Paul Melis p...@science.uva.nl wrote: I added a small issue where the statistics are not shown in a very readable way. I noted these problems when I was refactoring the internals to fix the threading issues. Fixing the sizes of the rectangles is trivial. Extra

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Art Tevs
Hi Robert, Robert Osfield wrote: My experiences were from nearly 10 years ago now.. But issues are the same. Fixing bugs is very much a social activity, in as much as it's the fixing bugs almost always requires a two way dialogue between the people able to reproduce the bug and those

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Osfield
Guys, please stop pontificating about bug tracking/ticketing etc. Leave this type of long winded discussion until after we've got OSG-2.8 out the door. Learning and introducing new schemes is not what you do when you have an immenient release, instead you get on with job of testing and debugging

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Jeremy Moles
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 15:16 +, Art Tevs wrote: Hi Robert, Robert Osfield wrote: My experiences were from nearly 10 years ago now.. But issues are the same. Fixing bugs is very much a social activity, in as much as it's the fixing bugs almost always requires a two way dialogue

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Jeremy, On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Jeremy Moles jer...@emperorlinux.com wrote: I'm confused by this thread somewhat--what exactly is going on? Is OSG adopting some external management software for bug tracking and what not, or are we discussing the possibility thereof? It's just

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Paul Melis
Robert Osfield wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Paul Melis p...@science.uva.nl wrote: I added a small issue where the statistics are not shown in a very readable way. I noted these problems when I was refactoring the internals to fix the threading issues. Fixing the sizes of

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Jeremy Moles
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 15:51 +, Robert Osfield wrote: Hi Jeremy, On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Jeremy Moles jer...@emperorlinux.com wrote: I'm confused by this thread somewhat--what exactly is going on? Is OSG adopting some external management software for bug tracking and what

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-27 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Jeremy, On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Jeremy Moles jer...@emperorlinux.com wrote: I get about 1000 lines worth of warnings when I build OSG with: -W -Wall ...which is troublesome, because it prevents me from using those arguments in my own projects because of the warnings in

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-25 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi Sukender, On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Sukender suky0...@free.fr wrote: That's a nice idea, and I may help for building/testing... But binaries may take much disk space, especially if dev releases are uploaded, and SVN is meant to keep all revisions (even if real deleting is still

[osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-23 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi All, I've now completed all the key feature development for OSG-2.8, and I'm focus on getting the svn/trunk stable enough to make the OpenSceneGraph-2.8 branch. My current thought is to complete the outstanding submission merges over the weekend and make the last dev release 2.7.9 on Monday.

Re: [osg-users] Development plan for imminent stable OSG-2.8

2009-01-23 Thread Jean-Sébastien Guay
Hi Robert, If svn/trunk is looking near perfect for the release we may even be able to get OSG-2.8.0 out this month, but probably we'll be talking about a release in the first week of February. Regarding this, I just did a build of current SVN and it went well, with the latest warning fixes