Hi Alberto,
On 23 May 2014 17:45, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> It is just this new version: libav version 9.10 works flawlessly,
> whether 10.1 does not.
Thanks for the clarification.
> I agree in ignoring the patch as is for now and setting a maximum
> version (9.10).
I haven't checked yet but I
Robert Osfield writes:
> Hi Alberto,
>
> Thanks for the testing. Do you know how far back the ffmpeg API used
> in the build fix for libav10 goes?
>
It is just this new version: libav version 9.10 works flawlessly,
whether 10.1 does not.
>
> I've looked at the code changes and they look a bit t
Hi Alberto,
Thanks for the testing. Do you know how far back the ffmpeg API used
in the build fix for libav10 goes?
I've looked at the code changes and they look a bit too intrusive to
easily retain backwards compatibility, so we'll either have to ignore
this patch for 3.2.1 or adopt it and set
Robert Osfield
writes:
> Hi All,
>
> This afternoon I tagged the OSG-3.2 branch to make the 3.2.1-rc3
> release. Could users please test out this latest release so we can
> get a feel for how close we are to tagging the final 3.2.1 release.
> Let me know on this thread if things work fine on you
Hi Paul,
On 22 May 2014 17:14, Paul Martz wrote:
> It looks like the osg::Geometry changes (deriving from osg::Node) are not on
> the 3.2 branch, just on trunk. Is that correct?
Yes, as far as I can I like to keep a stable branch ABI compatible so
no new features, just fixes.
Robert.
__
It looks like the osg::Geometry changes (deriving from osg::Node) are not
on the 3.2 branch, just on trunk. Is that correct?
-Paul
___
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-open
Hi All,
This afternoon I tagged the OSG-3.2 branch to make the 3.2.1-rc3
release. Could users please test out this latest release so we can
get a feel for how close we are to tagging the final 3.2.1 release.
Let me know on this thread if things work fine on your systems and
against your applicati
7 matches
Mail list logo
