roup osg::Geode" )
> {
> ...
> }
>
> The second way might be easier and more readable for further use.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wang Rui
>
> -- Original ------
> *From: * "Robert Osfield";;
> *Date: * Tue, Mar 24, 2015 05:37 PM
"Wang
Rui";
Subject: Re: [osg-users] Register object wrapper for osg::Geode
Hi John and Rui,
Well spotted. I am not sure what to do about this one. I think fixing the
REGISTER_OBJECT_WRAPPER to include osg::Group may well break the parsing of
.osgb files as the current se
Hi John and Rui,
Well spotted. I am not sure what to do about this one. I think fixing the
REGISTER_OBJECT_WRAPPER to include osg::Group may well break the parsing of
.osgb files as the current serializers aren't versioned for the associates
list.
Having two separate wrappers might be the way f
Hi,
I notice that osg::Geode now inherits osg::Group instead of osg::Node.
However, in the corresponsing serializer osg::Group is not mentioned in
REGISTER_OBJECT_WRAPPER( Geode,
new osg::Geode,
osg::Geode,
"osg::Object os
4 matches
Mail list logo