Re: [osg-users] Register object wrapper for osg::Geode

2015-03-24 Thread Robert Osfield
roup osg::Geode" ) > { > ... > } > > The second way might be easier and more readable for further use. > > Cheers, > > Wang Rui > > -- Original ------ > *From: * "Robert Osfield";; > *Date: * Tue, Mar 24, 2015 05:37 PM

Re: [osg-users] Register object wrapper for osg::Geode

2015-03-24 Thread Wang Rui
"Wang Rui"; Subject: Re: [osg-users] Register object wrapper for osg::Geode Hi John and Rui, Well spotted. I am not sure what to do about this one. I think fixing the REGISTER_OBJECT_WRAPPER to include osg::Group may well break the parsing of .osgb files as the current se

Re: [osg-users] Register object wrapper for osg::Geode

2015-03-24 Thread Robert Osfield
Hi John and Rui, Well spotted. I am not sure what to do about this one. I think fixing the REGISTER_OBJECT_WRAPPER to include osg::Group may well break the parsing of .osgb files as the current serializers aren't versioned for the associates list. Having two separate wrappers might be the way f

[osg-users] Register object wrapper for osg::Geode

2015-03-24 Thread John Ivar Haugland
Hi, I notice that osg::Geode now inherits osg::Group instead of osg::Node. However, in the corresponsing serializer osg::Group is not mentioned in REGISTER_OBJECT_WRAPPER( Geode, new osg::Geode, osg::Geode, "osg::Object os