Hi Ulrich,
Well of course a dynamic_cast is not always repleacable by a className() call.
This happens only sometimes. My bench' only says if you can, then use
className() and also says use dynamic_cast wisely: it costs a lot.
And about the static_cast in the bench', you're right, but I'm not
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Sukender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well of course a dynamic_cast is not always repleacable by a className()
call. This happens only sometimes. My bench' only says if you can, then use
className() and also says use dynamic_cast wisely: it costs a lot.
Hi Robert,
Thanks for being so precise. Well I knew most of it, but that's always good to
remember all of this. :)
And to also be precise: I just wanted to benchmark my system, and I had values
than outcame my expectations. So I told others about this.
Cheers,
Sukender
PVLE - Lightweight
Hello Sukender,
Quoting Sukender [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Has anyone *benchmarked* the difference between a dynamic_cast and a virtual
call to identify the type of a class? Before my benchmark, I guessed the
virtual call was cheaper, but how much? I just knew it depends a lot on how
types are
4 matches
Mail list logo
