Re: [osgeo4w-dev] Alternative osgeo4w infrastructure

2017-04-28 Thread Hugo Mercier
Hi Jüergen, On 27/04/2017 21:42, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > >> - the points listed above also result in a situation where there is a mix of >> compiler versions used for packages. Which should be avoided >> (http://siomsystems.com/mixing-visual-studio-versions/) > > That's certainly a

Re: [osgeo4w-dev] Alternative osgeo4w infrastructure

2017-04-27 Thread Jürgen E . Fischer
Hi Hugo, On Thu, 27. Apr 2017 at 18:23:35 +0200, Hugo Mercier wrote: > We've setup a compilation / CI infrastructure based on Gitlab CI that > triggers Virtual box virtual machines for the actual compilation and > packaging. Sounds like something on my "one-fine-day" TODO list for long. > So

Re: [osgeo4w-dev] Alternative osgeo4w infrastructure

2017-04-27 Thread André William
Hi Hugo! I'm a C++ dev that just started working on the QGIS project, and I gotta say the OSGeo4W build system is something I had avoided so far because of its complexity. I'd be happy to help with testing and coding in this project, although I might need some time (and some pointers) to get up

[osgeo4w-dev] Alternative osgeo4w infrastructure

2017-04-27 Thread Hugo Mercier
Hi, We've been involved recently in windows packaging based on osgeo4w. Some of our customers needed binaries for windows for some of our projects which require a recent C++ compiler. We would like to share and discuss our current infrastructure and see if there are some shared interests. We've