Hi,
thanks a lot for your mails. And i agree. It was not a good idea ;)
Sepcially adding a method to the context for DS was really bad.
Thanks a lot for clearing things up.
best, Florian
Am 19.03.15 um 18:06 schrieb Peter Kriens:
So you want to use DS functionality without DS?
Isn't
So you want to use DS functionality without DS?
Isn't that an archetypical example of eating your cake and having it too? :-)
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
On 18 mrt. 2015, at 18:50, Florian Pirchner florian.pirch...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey,
i got an idea for a nice DS enhancement.
Hey,
i got an idea for a nice DS enhancement. I am using DS a lot. And sometimes
google.Guice too. And indeed there are some usecases where these features
can be combined.
Using DS i sometimes a miss a method, that injects (wires) all references
according the component definition xml for classes
Hi Florian,
It's the SCR which picks up those XML files when the bundle containing
them is installed, and therefore knows what service interfaces it should
be listening for and which components need to be injected with those
services when they appear (and to de-inject them when they disappear).
osgi-dev-boun...@mail.osgi.org wrote on 2015/03/18 13:50:40:
From: Florian Pirchner florian.pirch...@gmail.com
i got an idea for a nice DS enhancement. I am using DS a lot. And
sometimes google.Guice too. And indeed there are some usecases where
these features can be combined.
Using DS i
