The spec states ".. static extensions being ranked below all whiteboard
services".
- Ray
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Bram Pouwelse wrote:
> I think the service ranking trick could work but .. what about an
> application that has a custom one defined in the application
I think the service ranking trick could work but .. what about an
application that has a custom one defined in the application itself?
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:46 PM Tim Ward wrote:
> In that case register the custom one targeting that exact application, and
> give it a
In that case register the custom one targeting that exact application, and give
it a higher service ranking than the default writer.
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
> On 25 Aug 2017, at 14:26, Bram Pouwelse wrote:
>
> I was more woried about conflicts, for example a default
Simply publish your "shared" extension with a low service ranking!
Finally, if an application needs a specific one, they need to depend on it
anyway!
- Ray
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Bram Pouwelse wrote:
> I was more woried about conflicts, for example a default
I was more woried about conflicts, for example a default "*MessageBodyWriter
to provide JSON serialization*" I could register that targeting all
applications but some application could need a customized one?
Bram
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:20 PM Raymond Auge
wrote:
>
Binding an extension to every app is pretty much free since only those
resources/applications/extensions having a dependency on it can/will use
it! Right?
- Ray
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Bram Pouwelse wrote:
> I was mainly looking for the possibility to register
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:05 PM Raymond Auge
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Bram Pouwelse wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have some questions about the "Additional JAX-RS types" section of the
>> JAX-RS-Services RFC (rfc-217).
>>
>> 5.2
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Bram Pouwelse wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have some questions about the "Additional JAX-RS types" section of the
> JAX-RS-Services RFC (rfc-217).
>
> 5.2 Additional JAX-RS types:
> …
> *"Extensions should provide an osgi.jaxrs.application.select