Re: [osgi-dev] Proposal named pids for ManagedServiceFactory

2015-04-08 Thread Raymond Auge
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Raymond Auge raymond.a...@liferay.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 2:33 PM, BJ Hargrave hargr...@us.ibm.com wrote: From: Raymond Auge raymond.a...@liferay.com On 04/06/2015 03:30 PM, BJ Hargrave wrote: Seem like you just need a convention where you put

Re: [osgi-dev] Proposal named pids for ManagedServiceFactory

2015-04-08 Thread Raymond Auge
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com wrote: Hi Am 06.04.2015 um 20:33 schrieb BJ Hargrave hargr...@us.ibm.com: From: Raymond Auge raymond.a...@liferay.com On 04/06/2015 03:30 PM, BJ Hargrave wrote: Seem like you just need a convention where you put

Re: [osgi-dev] Proposal named pids for ManagedServiceFactory

2015-04-08 Thread Raymond Auge
I guess one way to achieve all of this would be through metatype extension schema. On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: It looks good to me and prevent to update the spec. Regards JB On 04/08/2015 04:45 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: Hi Am

Re: [osgi-dev] Proposal named pids for ManagedServiceFactory

2015-04-08 Thread Christian Schneider
If it technically works then I agree a changed specification is not strictly necessary. We could instead describe the conventions in the OSGi wiki. I can then help make karaf and felix config admin / fileinstall work according to the conventions we agree on. Christian Am 08.04.2015 um 16:45