As I expected. Nor is it required that the reference impl. be in the org.osgi
namespace I gather.
I think it would have been/be beneficial if all the reference implementations
were named org.osgi.whatever and that there was a repo under osgi.org that
contained them all.
Not complaining, just something I thought about recently that I think it may
have simplified things a bit and helped grease the wheels of adoption so to
speak.
Regards,
Scott
From: Tim Ward
Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2020 12:11 PM
To: Leschke, Scott ; OSGi Developer Mail List
Subject: Re: [osgi-dev] Compendium services
Yes, it’s a requirement of the OSGi specification process that there be a
reference implementation and test suite for every specification chapter.
Note that the reference implementation may not always be open source (although
it is very rare that it isn’t) and isn’t guaranteed to be particularly fast or
scalable. It will, however, definitely pass the compliance tests.
Sent from my iPhone
On 14 Aug 2020, at 23:14, Leschke, Scott via osgi-dev
mailto:osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>> wrote:
I’m thinking this must be yes but do all compendium services have a reference
implementation?
Scott
___
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org<mailto:osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org>
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev__;!!PoMpmxQzTok3!uR47BDK8MNhT0PUHfSNkDdHRT55wwa1-L4oiU8lE7us7PYglPGmcfsu1DjuElgE$>
___
OSGi Developer Mail List
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
