Been running into an issue with circular references dealing with
ComponentFactory and I'm a bit confused.
I have:
@Component
class A implements X {
@Reference(target = CoreDeleteEObjects.CONFIG_TARGET)
private ComponentFactory coreDeleteFactory;
}
and the factory component matching
If it might help, we are in the process of using Infinispan at our end. It
is OSGi compliant (almost) and for Karaf users (not us yet), it comes with
features for easy deployment.
Alain
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 5:02 AM Mohamed AFIF via osgi-dev <
osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org> wrote:
> Hello
Hi Mohamed,
why not creating your caching service based on ehcache ?
I did that for some projects.
By the way, you have a good point: caching could a good Karaf feature
(similar to scheduler feature we have).
I created a Jira to add such kind of "out of the box" caching feature in
Karaf:
Hello Thomas, I returned from vacation this week and forgot to answer
this... :-[
We was afraid about jigsaw/modules, but we have installed the latest
Eclipse IDE and also JDK 11 on our dev machines and docker nodes where
we run integration tests.
The only problem was for one system that
Mohamed, if I understand correctly, what you really need in order to cache
method calls are proxies around arbitrary services.
First I don't think there's a OOTB solution for your problem description
specifically to do method caching.
Also, OSGi doesn't natively provide a proxy mechanism. In
Hi Alain,
Thanks a lot for sharing your experience, but as I've seen on
documentation , I'm not sure that infinispan handles cache of methods .
Regards.
Mohamed.
Le jeu. 22 nov. 2018 à 11:10, Alain Picard a écrit :
> If it might help, we are in the process of using Infinispan at our end.
... or go look at the Apache Felix (new) systemready project.
:)
- Ray
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018, 13:42 Cristiano via osgi-dev Hi,
>
> Well, I think there are many possible solutions for that.
>
> In my opinion, the complicated thing is how the OSGi framework would know
> what is necessary to it
Hi,
Well, I think there are many possible solutions for that.
In my opinion, the complicated thing is how the OSGi framework would
know what is necessary to it consider your application ready. Which
bundles? which services?
A combination of the new OSGi Configurator + DeclarativeServices +
On 11/22/2018 8:19 AM, Raymond Auge via osgi-dev wrote:
Mohamed, if I understand correctly, what you really need in order to
cache method calls are proxies around arbitrary services.
First I don't think there's a OOTB solution for your problem
description specifically to do method caching.
Scott, is that usable in-process, as in no remoting?
- Ray
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018, 14:55 Scott Lewis via osgi-dev On 11/22/2018 8:19 AM, Raymond Auge via osgi-dev wrote:
>
> Mohamed, if I understand correctly, what you really need in order to cache
> method calls are proxies around arbitrary
Thank you all for the suggestion, I'll take a look into felix systemready
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 2:21 PM Raymond Auge
wrote:
> ... or go look at the Apache Felix (new) systemready project.
>
> :)
>
> - Ray
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018, 13:42 Cristiano via osgi-dev wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Well, I
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018, 15:30 Raymond Auge Scott, is that usable in-process, as in no remoting?
>
> - Ray
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018, 14:55 Scott Lewis via osgi-dev <
> osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org wrote:
>
>> On 11/22/2018 8:19 AM, Raymond Auge via osgi-dev wrote:
>>
>> Mohamed, if I understand correctly,
12 matches
Mail list logo
