http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?idarticle=9533

UK: How Britain encouraged terrorsm <sic> - Part Four


Hamza arrived at the Finsbury Park mosque in north London in 1997. By this 
time, he had become a vocal exponent of radical Islam.


Britain has long had a policy of accepting "asylum seekers" onto its shores. A 
noble policy in principle, it has allowed Islamists who are too extreme for 
their own Islamic countries to arrive and thrive. Within Britain, these 
individuals have been allowed to continue preaching their extremism, with 
little or no interference from the authorities.

Individuals such as Omar Bakri Mohammed, Abu Qatada, Yasser al-Siri,  
<http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/002488.html> Mohammed 
al-Massari arrived as refugees seeking sanctuary, and then proceeded to agitate 
among British Muslims. One famous arrival was Abu Hamza al-Masri (pictured), 
the fiery former cleric of the Finsbury Park Mosque. Hamza arrived on  
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article669525.ece> July 13, 
1979, not as a refugee, but on a one-month visitor's visa.

Egyptian Hamza, real name Mostafa Kamel Mostafa, was not allowed to work 
according to the visa terms, but he did. He renewed the visa for a month and 
when this ran out, he did not renew it. On May 16, 1980 he married a British 
woman, Valerie Traverso, and in summer, 1982, he was allowed to live in Britain 
indefinitely. Traverso had left her husband Michael Macias, to marry Hamza. It 
was not until  
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,925698,00.html> 2003 that 
it was revealed her divorce from Macias did not happen until July 1982. The 
marriage which gave Hamza legitimate right to remain was itself illegitimate. 
In June 1984, Hamza moved to divorce Valerie, and the decree was issued on 
August 15, 1984. In October that year, Hamza married a young Moroccan woman and 
he became a UK citizen in 1986.

By this time, Hamza (still called Mostafa) had shown little Islamic "fervor", 
though when Valerie found he was cheating with an alleged prostitute he 
promised to become religious. Once his citizenship was secured, Hamza went 
traveling. When he left Britain, he still had two eyes and two hands.

In 1987, while on the Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca he met Sheikh Abdullah Azzam, 
founder of the Afghan "Muhajideen", the group originally formed to fight the 
Soviets who had invaded in early 1979. Azzam and his sons were assassinated in 
Peshawar, Pakistan in November 1989. According to the BBC in  
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3752517.stm> 2004, Hamza shortly afterward this 
meeting packed his bags and went to Afghanistan, vowing "never to return". The 
BBC promotes the lie which Hamza told, that he had gone to Jalalabad to engage 
in reconstruction work, and here he had lost both hands and one eye while 
clearing mines.

Hamza came back to Britain in 1993 but by 1995 he had gone to Bosnia to provide 
"support" to the Muslims. The tale of how he lost his hands was doubted by 
British writer Farrukh Dhondy, who suggested in  
<http://frontpagemag.com/articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5570> 2003 that his injury 
ensued from a "bomb-making gone wrong". In  
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article641949.ece> 2006, "Omar 
Nasiri" revealed the truth. Nasiri was a Moroccan, acting as an undercover 
agent for both French and UK intelligence. He described how he attended an Al 
Qaeda training camp in  
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/index.php?id=811317> Darunta, 
Afghanistan, which was blown up by a US air strike on October 12, 2001. 

In the late 1990s in Darunta, Nasiri was told by his explosives "tutor" Assad 
Allah of an event that had occurred when Allah was a student. One fellow 
student had messed up his recipe for explosives, and "rushed towards the door 
with the liquid timebomb in his hands. Just as he got outside, the mixture 
exploded. It blew both his hands straight off and destroyed one of his eyes." 
Nasiri asked if the person survived, and was told: "Yes. He lives in London 
now, and preaches in the mosques. His name is Abu Hamza."

Hamza arrived at the Finsbury Park mosque in north London in 1997. By this 
time, he had become a vocal exponent of radical Islam. With a group of henchmen 
he began to bully the trustees until he finally gained power there. Abdulkadir 
Barkatullah, one of the trustees, said that he had reported the thuggish 
behavior of Hamza and his associates to the polic on no less than  
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article670249.ece> seven 
occasions, but no action was taken. In the mid-1980s, before he had gone to 
Afghanistan, Hamza had already been reported to police by various mosque 
trustees for his bullying behavior.

>From 1997 onwards there was a power struggle at the mosque. When Hamza was not 
>allowed to gain entry to the building, he and his followers would hold prayer 
>sessions in a road near Finsbury Park underground station. The route of the 
>106 bus, which I used to take regularly at that time, had to be diverted to 
>accommodate Hamza and his followers. Police would watch the street services, 
>but no arrests for "obstruction" were made.

The precise moment that Hamza became radical is not known - it seems to have 
happened before he met Abdullah Azzam in 1987. At Finsbury Park Mosque, he had 
his own arena from which he would preach hatred for the West and also draw 
recruits for his jihadist cause. His followers fell into two camps - people 
from Arabic origin and those of Pakistani origin. 

In the late 1990s, Hamza  
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article628379.ece> tried to buy 
a 54-room building in East Sussex to use as a jihad school. When this failed, 
he turned his attention to locations in Wales and Lancashire before selecting 
Dog Cry Ranch in Bly, Oregon, which he hoped to use as a terror training camp. 
The East Sussex building became the  
<http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/002899.html> Jameah Islamiyah 
Islamic school. Hamza and a group of followers later visited this school on at 
least five occasions, camping in the 54 acre grounds.

Despite Hamza's inflammatory sermons and his use of force against mosque 
trustees, the British intelligence services appear not to have shown any 
interest in Hamza until 1998. It was in this year, as Sean O'Neill and Daniel 
McGrory  <http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,29389-2205344.html> relate in 
their book "The Suicide Factory", that Hamza became involved with the leader of 
a gang who carried out a kidnapping operation in Yemen on  
<http://www.al-bab.com/yemen/hamza/hostage.htm> 28 December 1998. 16 tourists, 
including 12 Britons, 2 Australians, 2 Americans, along with their 4 Yemeni 
drivers had been taken hostage. Within two days, 3 Britons and one Australian 
were dead.

Intelligence agencies from France, Spain, Germany, Italy, Belgium and the 
Netherlands had warned that Hamza was heading a terrorist organization, but 
their calls were ignored. Hamza bought a satellite phone and communicated 
directly with the leader of the kidnappers,  
<http://www.al-bab.com/yemen/hamza/hassan.htm> Abu al-Hassan. Hassan was head 
of the "Islamic Army of Aden-Abyan". He told al-Wasat magazine on January 11 
that when he told Hamza of the kidnapping, Hamza had warned against harming 
them. The hostages who died were killed in a rescue attempt by Yemeni 
authorities.

Hamza's phone conversations with al-Hassan were intercepted and recorded at 
Britain's listening center, GCHQ in Cheltenham. Police had sent a file to the 
Crown Prosecution Service, urging his arrest, but the call was rejected for 
"insufficient evidence". Phone tap evidence is not admissable in a UK court of 
law. The FBI, state O'Neill and McGrory, stated they would use the phone 
evidence if Hamza were to be prosecuted in the US.

In March 1999, Hamza was arrested, and his home was subjected to a thorough 
search. Among items taken away for examination was an 11-volume terror manual, 
entitled "The Encyclopedia of Afghani Jihad", which gave bomb-making and poison 
manufacture. It also advised potential bombing targets, such as Big Ben and the 
Eiffel Tower, and tips on assassination techniques. Three tapes of Hamza's 
sermons were also taken away by police. Amazingly, the police later returned 
the Jihad manual to Hamza. He was released after a few days.

When Hamza was finally charged and convicted of inciting murder on  
<http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/001617.html> February 7, 2006, 
he was additionally sentenced to three years' jail for possessing "The 
Encyclopedia of Afghani Jihad".

>From July 1999 to November 2000 an informant was placed in the Finsbury Park 
>Mosque.  <http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/article812572.ece> 
>Reda Hassaine (pictured) was an Algerian-born journalist who had first visited 
>the mosque in 1998. He had become upset by what he had found and contacted 
>police Special Branch (SO13). Originally Hassaine was in the service of 
>Algerian authorities, who were trying to suppress the terrorist group GIA 
>(Groupe Islam Armee). The GIA had members in Britain and France. Both the 
>French authorities and British authorities waved promises of asylum for 
>Hassaine as an inducement to get him to provide information. He posed as a GIA 
>member at the mosque and faithfully delivered reports to MI5 and the French 
>DRG. But neither the French nor the British granted him the asylum he sought.

Hassaine provided information on Abu Qatada and Abu Hamza. He later  
<http://observer.guardian.co.uk/focus/story/0,,439639,00.html> claimed that he 
had felt betrayed. He was astounded that no action was taken against Hamza and 
the mosque. He  <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4671128.stm> said of the 
Finsbury Park Mosque: "There were people there who would sell passports and 
credit cards and it was like having one foot in a mosque and one foot in the 
mafia." 

As had been the case with Omar Bakri Mohammed, MI5 did not take Hamza 
seriously. Reda Hassaine  
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article730018.ece> claimed: "I told 
them Abu Hamza was brainwashing people and sending them to terrorist training 
camps in Afghanistan, that he was preaching jihad and murder and that he was 
involved in the provision of false passports. I told them he was a chief 
terrorist. The MI5 officer told me Abu Hamza was harmless and that MI5 thought 
he was a clown." When Hassaine offered to carry a hidden camera, "They told me 
not to bother, that they weren’t interested."

After 9/11, it became clear that militants had graduated from Hamza's mosque to 
engage in international terrorism.  
<http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/002074.html> Zacarias 
Moussaoui, the "20th hijacker" who was arrested in Michigan on August 16, 2001, 
had worshipped at the mosque, as had Richard Reid, the shoe-bomber who tried to 
blow up a Miami-bound plane on December 22, 2001. Reid's associate Sajjid 
Badat, who also planned to be a shoe-bomber, had similarly worshipped at the 
mosque.

The publicity that Hamza was bringing to himself and the mosque did not serve 
to stem his extremism. It was claimed by Russian authorities that a man who had 
worshipped at Hamza's mosque and left to fight in Chechnya in 2001 had been an 
associate of Islamic terrorist Shamil Besayev. This individual,  
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/chechnya/Story/0,,1318587,00.html> Kamel Rabat 
Bouralha, as well as two others, had not only been worshippers at the mosque, 
but would later be among the 33 Islamists who carried out the Beslan school 
massacre of September 1, 2004. 300 people had been killed in the attack, more 
than half of them children.

Three of the 7/7 bombers - Mohamed Siddique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, and Jermaine 
Lindsay - had gone to the Finsbury Park Mosque to listen to Hamza's sermons. 
WIlly Brigitte was a French national who had been deported from Australia in  
<http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/11/22/1069027366970.html?from=storyrhs> 
2003 after being suspected of plotting to blow up the nuclear reactor at Lucas 
Heights, Sydney. He was jailed in Paris on  
<http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/brigitte-verdict-leaves-questions-unanswered/2007/03/16/1173722744322.html>
 March 15 this year for nine years for "criminal association with a terrorist 
enterprise." Brigitte had worshipped at the Finsbury Park Mosque. James Ujaama 
had stayed inside the mosque in 1999. 

Even though Hamza and the mosque appeared to act as a conduit for jihadists to 
go abroad and commit acts of terror, the UK authorities only took action when 
it appeared that his associates were ready to commit acts of terror at home. 
Following a tip-off that was received from Algerian intelligence on  
<http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1461715,00.html> January 
3, 2003, UK intelligence became aware that an illegal Algerian immigrant with 
links to the mosque was plotting to create the deadly toxin, ricin. This man,  
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/index.php?id=817543> Kamel Bourgass lived 
in Wood Green, a short bus ride from the mosque.

When traced to an apartment in Manchester, Bourgass stabbed and killed a police 
detective. Bourgass frequently stayed at the Finsbury Park Mosque, and it was 
here that he had photocopied recipes for toxins. In his Wood Green apartment, 
police had found chemical equipment and documentation on poison production. On  
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2676481.stm> January 20 the mosque was 
raided (pictured) in connection with Kamel Bourgass' links to the building. 7 
people were arrested, and items were found in the building. The full inventory 
of recovered items was not to be revealed until February 7, 2006.

Abu Hamza himself was arrested on May 27, 2004, in connection with an American 
extradition order, which had been filed on nine counts in relation to his 
attempts to set up a terrorist training camp in Oregon with James Ujaama and 
others in 1999. While Hamza was being detained at Belmarsh prison in relation 
to the US order, he was arrested on  
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1291700,00.html> August 26.

Hamza was not officially charged with any terrorist offenses until  
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article496621.ece> October 19, 2004. 
He was charged on 16 counts under the Terrorism Act 2000 and also the Public 
Order Act. The trial began in the summer of 2005 but was adjourned.

Hamza was convicted on  
<http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/001617.html> February 7, 2006. 
He was found guilty of incitement to murder and given a jail sentence of 7 
years. The jury unanimously found him guilty on six out of nine charges of 
soliciting murder under the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, and on three 
charges of inciting racial hatred under the Public Order Act. Mr Justice Hughes 
 <http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article728419.ece> said that Hamza 
had "created a real danger to the lives of innocent people in different parts 
of the world".

The judge additionally  
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article728232.ece> stated: "You used 
your authority to legitimise anger and to encourage your audiences to believe 
that it gave rise to a duty to murder. You commended suicide bombing, you 
encouraged them to kill in the cause you set out for them."

He was convicted under Section 58 of the Terrorism Act 2000 of possessing 
information "of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing 
an act of terrorism". This was the terror manual, though in court he was 
accused of possessing only 10 of the 11 volumes of the "Encyclopedia of Afghani 
Jihad". Volume Six, which dealt with "Bombs and Landmines" had gone  
<http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/001487.html> missing. The judge 
said he was satisfied that this volume had been "loaned out". A volume 
detailing in specific terms how to create bombs is therefore still circulating 
somewhere.

During the trial, passages from the Koran were  
<http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/001505.html> quoted by his 
defense lawyer, Edward Fitzgerald QC. Chapter 2, verse 216 and Chapter 9 verse 
111 were cited as purported proof that Hamza's calls for warfare against 
non-Muslims were religiously "justifiable".

The  
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/08/nhamz08.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/02/08/ixnewstop.html>
 items which had been seized from the mosque in January 2003 were disclosed, 
confirming leaked reports made by the Times shortly after the raid. The items 
included three starting pistols, which could easily be reassigned to firing 
live rounds, a stun gun, knives, CS gas and chemical and nuclear warfare 
protective suits. Also, hidden behind ceiling tiles, dozens of forged documents 
were discovered, including driving licenses and passports.

How much Hamza directly contributed to global jihad is not known, but it is 
obvious that he inspired many people who went on to commit acts of terror. What 
is unforgivable is that the UK authorities only wanted to stop the pipelines of 
terror when their own citizens were affected. As Daniel Pipes  
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/global.php?id=668213> explained at a 
conference in London in January: "British-based terrorists have carried out 
operations in at least 15 countries, going from East to West ... Pakistan, 
Afghanistan, Kenya, Tanzania, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iraq, Jordan, Israel, 
Algeria, Morocco, Russia, France, Spain and the United States." If one adds the 
handiwork of Al-Muhajiroun member Mohammed Bilal, who killed nine people in 
Srinigar, India, on Christmas Day, 2000, that figure amounts to at least 16 
countries.

On  <http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/000202.html> August 1, 
2005, the BBC broadcast a report by journalist Richard Watson. Former members 
of Al Muhajiroun spoke. Abu Uzair (aka Sajid Sharif, who has  
<http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006060518,00.html> preached at Hamza's 
Finsbury Park Mosque) said: "We don't live in peace with you any more, which 
means the covenant of security is no longer, doesn't no longer(sic) exist... 
That's why, those four bombers, um, er, that attacked, er, London - they 
believed that there was no covenant of security, and for them, their belief 
was, it was allowed, to attack the UK.... For them, it was allowed. For them it 
was particularly allowed. Because me, myself, my belief hasn't been attacked 
personally myself. For them, the banner has been risen for Jihad in the UK, 
which means, for them, it's allowed for them to attack, and they've probably 
got many other cells inside the UK... You could call them terrorist cells. I 
would call them Muslim cells in the UK."

 <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/global.php?id=720166> Abu Izzadeen, who 
is now  <http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/003712.html> in 
custody, suspected of supporting terrorism operations abroad, claimed democracy 
was not Islamic. He said: "If the British public don't like Shariah, it's going 
to be over their noses, whether they like it or not. It's going to be over Tony 
Blair's nose and George Bush's nose as well - and for your information - the 
British government knows that." Later he said to the interviewer: "You don't 
want to live in a Shariah? Well, when it comes, I'm sure you'll change your 
mind!"

Izzadeen and Uzair were leading figures in groups called Al Ghurabaa (the 
strangers), and the Saviour Sect, both derivatives of Al Muhajiroun and with 
the same core membership. The Saviour Sect soon changed its name to the Saved 
Sect. The groups were officially banned in  
<http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/002585.html> July 2006. Despite 
this, the same people still operate under another name - Ahlus Sunnah wal 
Jammah. This group was formed in Tottenham, north London in  
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4449714.stm> November 2005. It organized the 
notorious anti-cartoon  
<http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/002478.html> demonstration of 
February 3, 2006 where protesters called for the beheading of those that insult 
Islam, but has not been outlawed. Changing of names to escape detection and 
legislation is a  <http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/002928.html> 
tactic shared by former Al Muhajiroun members and also Hizb ut-Tahrir.

The recent revelations of the  
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/index.php?id=940500> Operation Crevice 
trial, showed how members of Al Muhajiroun were actively conspiring with the 
same figures who carried out the atrocities of 7/7. MI5 has been exposed as 
less than adequately prepared to cope with homegrown extremism. The Crevice 
revelations have laid to rest the myth that members of the Al Muhajiroun group, 
and their guru Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed, were harmless.

Omar Bakri Mohammed, founder of Al Muhajiroun, fled Britain in August 2005, and 
was banned from re-entering the country. Other extremist preachers remain, 
including Abu Qatada, Abdullah el-Faisal, Mohammed al-Masri and Yasser al-Siri. 
The terms of Labour's 1998 Human Rights Act have created a situation where 
deporting these promoters of jihad to their home countries is nigh impossible.

Britain should have acted against its preachers of hate during the 1990s. A 
decade later, a whole generation of young Muslims in Britain have become 
radicalized. A  <http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/images/libimages/246.pdf> 
survey for the right-wing Policy Exchange Group, published in January of this 
year found that nearly a third of British Muslims aged 16-24 believed that 
anyone who left Islam should be killed.

The right wing in Britain have slowly started to wake up to the mess that 
Blair's policies of forced multiculturalism have produced. The  
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/index.php?id=512264> Muslim Council of 
Britain (MCB), like its US counterpart CAIR, purports to be "moderate". In 
truth the MCB is dominated by extremists such as Iqbal Sacranie and Inayat 
Bunglawala who have openly supported Osama bin Laden in the past. Bunglawala 
has called him a "freedom fighter". Bunglawala has previously  
<http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/08/21/nbung21.xml> 
praised jailed terrorist Omar Abdel-Rahman as "courageous". Though they now 
repudiate their earlier statements, the brand of Islam peddled by the MCB 
luminaries is one of conformity to rigid 7th century values. The MCB has  
<http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/000119.html> campaigned to have 
Holocaust Memorial day banned, and has consistently  
<http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/001245.html> boycotted the 
event.

David Cameron, leader of the Tory party, in  
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/31/ntory31.xml> 
February this year, endorsed a report by his party, entitled Uniting the 
Country. This report claimed that the MCB, which approves the anti-Semitic and 
terrorist-endorsing cleric Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, had created a climate in 
which "hardline members... dominate policy and crowd out more moderate voices."

In August 2005, Tony Blair suggested that he wanted to ban the extremist group 
Hizb ut-Tahrir, which had spawned the terrorist-supporting group Al Muhajiroun. 
Hizb ut-Tahrir  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/religion/Story/0,,1544272,00.html> 
threatened mass riots across the country, and the MCB refused to endorse a ban 
on the anti-democratic group unless Blair also banned the ultra-right party the 
BNP. Blair bowed down to MCB pressure, and shelved plans to ban Hizb ut-Tahrir.

Blair is soon to resign from the Labour Party and he will, in all likelihood, 
be replaced by Gordon Brown, the current chancellor. In  
<http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/003390.html> November 2006, 
Brown approved the spending of $910 million over four years. This funding to 
Pakistan is mainly to be spent on subsidizing madrassas, the seminaries that 
are notorious for their uncompromising interpretations on Islam and their 
contempt for the West. Despite this "generosity", Brown has allowed  
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/22/ndefence22.xml>
 massive cutbacks on national defense. Brown also wants to have more  
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/03/nvisa303.xml> 
control over the activities of MI5. 

The Labour Party has helped to force its culture of leftism and appeasement 
onto an unwilling populace. When the party was elected in 1997, there was still 
time to root out the godfathers of radicalism. Now it is too late. The radical 
preachers' poison has infected a whole generation, and rather than standing up 
for inclusive national values, the leftist Labour party has farmed out its 
policies on Islam to unelected bodies such as the MCB. Worse than that, for the 
past four years the government has decided to "engage" with radical Islam 
rather than counter it. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has a branch called 
the " <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/index.php?id=472434> Engaging with 
the Islamic World Group", which in 2006 paid for Yusuf al-Qaradawi to attend a 
conference in Turkey. Qaradawi, the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, 
has issued a fatwa supporting killing of Israeli civilians. Such a man should 
not be courted and subsidized by British tax-payers.

The fate that Britain has brought upon itself has so far been avoided by the 
United States. But the voices of the left are clamoring to be heard. Should a 
Nancy Pelosi-style strategy (or lack of one) be followed, the US could 
precisely reproduce Britain's poor template for tackling Islamic radicalism. 
Innocent Muslims suffer as much as anyone else from Islamist extremists, yet 
their voices are never heard. Pressure groups such as the MCB and CAIR do not 
represent ordinary, law-abiding Muslim citizens. These bodies have a specific 
agenda which, though not outwardly supporting terrorism, shares exactly the 
same ultimate goals as those of the most bloodthirsty Islamist. As Omar Ahmed, 
co-founder of CAIR,  <http://www.anti-cair-net.org/> said: "Islam isn't in 
America to be equal to any other faiths, but to become dominant. The Koran, the 
Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam 
the only accepted religion on Earth."

People who try to change a democracy not by the ballot, but by the backdoor, 
are the ones whose voices should never be legitimized by government patronage.

This article was also published at FamilySecurityMatters.org

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to