How can Muslims NOT be al-Qaeda sympathizers.unless there are personality
conflicts.al-Qaeda reflects mainstream Islam.

 

Bruce

 

 

In London, Islamic radicals find a haven 
Diverse mosaic of al Qaeda sympathizers make British capital their base

By Steve Coll and Susan B. Glasser

The <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/front.htm>  Washington Post

Updated: 11:54 p.m. ET July 9, 2005

 

LONDON - On the morning after bombs ripped through the London Underground
and crumpled a double-decker bus, four security guards escorted a one-eyed,
Egyptian-born cleric, his arms amputated below the elbows from Afghan war
injuries, onto the elevated dock of Courtroom No. 1 in Old Bailey, the
capital's principal criminal court.

Abu Hamza Masri, for years a blood-curdling preacher at a North London
mosque allegedly visited by shoe bomber Richard Reid and hijacker trainee
Zacarias Moussaoui, listened silently Friday as his lawyer argued about his
indictment last January on nine counts of incitement to murder for speeches
that allegedly promoted mass violence against non-Muslims. In one speech
cited in a British documentary film, Masri urged followers to get an infidel
"and crush his head in your arms, so you can wring his throat. Forget
wasting a bullet, cut them in half!"

Masri's case is just one of several dozen that describe the venom, sprawling
shape and deep history of al Qaeda and related extremist groups in London.
Osama bin Laden opened a political and media office here as far back as
1994; it closed four years later when his local lieutenant, Khalid Fawwaz,
was arrested for aiding al Qaeda's attack on two U.S. embassies in Africa.

'The Star Wars bar scene'
As bin Laden's ideology of making war on the West spread in the years before
Sept. 11, 2001, London became "the Star Wars bar scene" for Islamic
radicals, as former White House counterterrorism official Steven Simon
called it, attracting a polyglot group of intellectuals, preachers,
financiers, arms traders, technology specialists, forgers, travel organizers
and foot soldiers.

Today, al Qaeda and its offshoots retain broader connections to London than
to any other city in Europe, according to evidence from terrorist
prosecutions. Evidence shows at least a supporting connection to London
groups or individuals in many of the al Qaeda-related attacks of the past
seven years. Among them are the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and
Tanzania; the assassination of Afghan militia leader Ahmed Shah Massoud on
Sept. 9, 2001; outer rings of the Sept. 11 conspiracy, involving Moussaoui
and the surveillance of financial targets in Washington and New York; Reid's
attempted shoe bomb attack in December 2001; and the murder of Wall Street
Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in 2002.

The evidence in these and other cases describes al Qaeda connections here as
remarkably diverse, ranging from the core organization's early formation
through its phase of elaborately planned global strikes between 1999 and
2001, to its more recent period of diffuse franchises and younger volunteers
to an attack this week that authorities here said bears al Qaeda's stamp. In
the 1980s and 1990s, between 300 and 600 British citizens passed through
Afghan training camps, officials here have acknowledged. Today, several
recent cases suggest the seeding of a new generation of British residents
who traveled as volunteers to fight with the insurgency in Iraq.

On June 15, 2002, at an Islamic community center in Milan, Italy, a cleric
with alleged ties to al Qaeda was overheard in conversation with an Arab
from Germany, according to a transcript of the wiretap later published in
Italy. The Arab spoke of his 10-person cell in Germany and the group's
"interest" in Belgium, Spain, the Netherlands, Turkey, Egypt, Italy and
France. "But the nerve center is still London," he reported.

Ambiguous policies
A refuge and hub for Middle Eastern dissidents since the 19th century
imperial era, the city has more recently attracted Islamic radicals with
connections to Morocco, Egypt, Syria, the Persian Gulf and Pakistan.
London's radical fringe draws in part from the alienated edges of Britain's
large and overwhelmingly peaceful Muslim immigrant population. But it has
been influenced, too, by Britain's ambiguous policies toward exiled
radicals, a sometimes awkward blend of asylum offers, intelligence
collection and criminal prosecution.

Masri, for instance, received asylum in Britain from Egypt in the late '70s
and British citizenship in 1981. He volunteered to fight in Afghanistan in
the 1990s, then returned to Britain to preach justifications for violence
against those he perceived to be Islam's enemies. Throughout, Masri met
periodically with Britain's intelligence services and anti-terrorism police,
who were investigating his activities. The government moved to strip him of
citizenship, but only in late 2004 did the Crown Prosecution Service
conclude it had enough evidence to bring criminal charges, even though some
of the speeches it relied on had taken place years before.

"We're not an investigative authority. We can only review evidence brought
to us by the police," said a spokesman for the prosecutors, explaining the
delay. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because Masri's case is
scheduled for trial soon. "There must be a sufficient chance of successful
conviction" before charges will be filed.

Arab dissidents find a base
Radical Islamic exiles value London as a base in part because "the legal
system is quite stable and it cannot be influenced by politicians or by
public opinion," said Saad Faqih, a Saudi dissident accused by the U.S.
Treasury Department of providing financial support to al Qaeda because of
his alleged role in the 1998 purchase of a satellite phone used by bin
Laden.

Faqih said he had no connection to al Qaeda or to violence and that his
primary focus was the overthrow of the Saudi royal family through political
advocacy and organizing. His British assets have been frozen because of the
U.S. Treasury designation, but Faqih has not been charged criminally here.
On Thursday, a previously unknown group calling itself the Secret
Organization of al Qaeda in Europe asserted responsibility for the London
bombings in a posting on a radical Islamic Web site allegedly connected to
Faqih; he denied running the site, a bulletin board with the Arabic name for
fortress that was registered just a week after the Sept. 11 attacks.

In an interview, Faqih said he tries to maintain cordial, open relations
with British authorities because he believes they are under pressure from
Saudi Arabia and the United States to crack down on his political
activities. He said he keeps up "high-level contacts" with the British
intelligence services. "I always give them the best I can in terms of
advice" about Saudi Arabia and other issues. "The British intelligence -
although they are very effective, they will pick you up very quickly - they
will not trick you into making a mistake" that could lead to criminal
prosecution, he said.

Britain's tolerance of exiled dissidents and terrorist sympathizers has
sometimes frustrated U.S. officials. U.S. intelligence officers say they
respect the sophistication of Britain's intelligence collection among
radicals in London, but some question whether its emphasis on monitoring, as
opposed to the preemptive disruption often favored by the FBI in the United
States, has left the country vulnerable.

"I've been preaching London will get hit long before us," said a former
senior U.S. counterterrorism official who spoke on condition of anonymity
due to the subject's sensitivity. "They have a critical mass of a group of
radicals operating in an open society."

The London connection
Al Qaeda's London connection began in the early 1990s after Saudi Arabia
cracked down on Islamic dissidents, including bin Laden, who had pressured
the royal family for political reforms and protested its decision to invite
United States forces to expel Iraq from Kuwait. Dozens of Saudi radicals
were imprisoned; some were forced or escaped into exile.

Bin Laden fled to the relative isolation of Sudan, where he nurtured his
nascent multinational militia. But other Saudi dissidents sought out London
and set up offices from where they peppered the Saudi kingdom with faxes
denouncing the royal family. Bin Laden wanted to be part of this, and he
dispatched Fawwaz to London to set up the Advice and Reform Committee, which
began its own fax pamphleteering aimed at the kingdom, with a special
emphasis on bin Laden's ideas.

According to Faqih, who led a rival group, bin Laden and Fawwaz issued 17
communique from London between 1994 and 1996 about "scattered things" such
as Saudi corruption and the need for truer adherence to Islamic law. After
bin Laden moved to Afghanistan and declared war on the United States in the
summer of 1996, Fawwaz stopped publishing, Faqih said, because he feared
possible British criminal charges.

Fawwaz set up his al Qaeda branch in the placid North London suburb of
Dollis Hill on a street of 1930s Tudor-style houses. Peter Bergen, an author
who interviewed bin Laden in the spring of 1998 with Fawwaz's assistance,
recalled that Fawwaz described bin Laden as "humble, charming, intelligent,
a really significant wealthy chap," Bergen recounted in his book "Holy War,
Inc."

After the 1998 embassy bombings, the U.S. used evidence of Fawwaz's
logistical and media support for bin Laden to indict him on criminal
charges. British police arrested him and two other bin Laden aides in London
(nearly seven years later, Fawwaz is still in a high-security London prison
with the fight over his extradition pending).

Not all of al Qaeda's top British operatives were rounded up then. Anas
Liby, one of bin Laden's computer experts, had continued to live in the
northern England city of Manchester even after the U.S. demanded his
extradition on charges he participated in setting up the bombing of the
American embassy in Kenya. On May 10, 2000, the British police raided Liby's
apartment in an area of quiet town houses known as Moss Side. Liby was gone,
a fugitive who would eventually have a $25 million reward for his capture
offered by the United States.

Left behind on his computer was an al Qaeda training manual that spelled out
the organization's tradecraft in 180 pages of chilling detail - down to the
art of killing with "cold steel" and the need, as Liby practiced, to go
undercover in the West ("necessity permits the forbidden," the manual
counseled, though no necessity could be cited to allow heresies such as
drinking wine or fornicating).

Although Britain had harbored many of his lieutenants, bin Laden made clear
in a speech not long after the raid why history made the country an
implacable enemy. "The British are responsible for destroying the caliphate
system. They are the ones who created the Palestinian problem. They are the
ones who created the Kashmiri problem. They are the ones who put the arms
embargo on the Muslims of Bosnia so that 2 million Muslims were killed. They
are the ones who are starving the Iraqi children. And they are continuously
dropping bombs on these innocent Iraqi children."

An indispensable center
"George Bush has no respect for the Muslim world. This has been designed to
make sure he listens," Abu Qatada, a fiery Palestinian who also preached at
the Finsbury Park mosque said in a London newspaper immediately after the
attacks of Sept. 11. Granted asylum in Britain from Jordan, Qatada has been
convicted in absentia of playing a role in an al Qaeda-linked millennium
bombing plot there. He is also designated as a terrorist by the U.S.
government.

But Qatada is better known as an ideologue of global holy war than an
organizer of it. When Sept. 11 hijacker Mohamed Atta's apartment in Germany
was searched, authorities turned up videotapes of Qatada's London sermons.
The British arrested Qatada in late 2002 but he was never charged and was
released in March. "He's been cited as the spiritual leader by at least a
half dozen terrorist cells," said Evan F. Kohlmann, a researcher who has
written a book on Islamic terrorist groups in Europe.

For al Qaeda and its affiliates, the British capital has been considered an
indispensable communications center. "They looked on London as the premier
place for propaganda in the Western world," said Michael Scheuer, who headed
the CIA's special bin Laden unit in the mid-1990s.

Even after the arrest of al Qaeda's London spokesman, Fawwaz, London
remained a clearinghouse for the group's information and ideas. Just a few
months after Sept. 11, bin Laden's chief deputy, Egyptian doctor Ayman
Zawahiri, published from hiding a lengthy memoir-cum-holy war-treatise,
"Knights Under the Prophet's Banner," as a 12-part series in the London
newspaper Al-Sharq al-Awsat.

Crack down after 9/11
The shock of Sept. 11 brought a sharp increase in British arrests of Islamic
militants, many with some alleged connection to al Qaeda. But clerics like
Qatada who worked in what Simon, the former counterterrorism official,
called "the realm of inspiration" have continued to preach holy war in
London. Altogether, 700 suspects were taken into British custody under the
counterterrorism law between 2001 and the end of 2004. Only 17 have been
convicted.

Among those arrested after 2001 was Yasir Tawfiq Sirri. A slight, balding
man who ran a group called the Islamic Observation Center, he was mostly
known up to that point for press releases critical of the Egyptian
government. Simon recalled meeting Sirri in a London hotel lobby and
thinking of him as "an allegedly retired Egyptian militant." Later in 2001,
the men who killed the Afghan anti-Taliban leader Massoud, gained entry to
his compound by claiming to be Arab journalists from Sirri's London group.
Sirri was arrested in London after the Sept. 11 attacks but was never
prosecuted.

British citizen Omar Sheikh Mohammed was arrested in 2002 in connection with
the murder of Pearl, the journalist, in Pakistan. Radicalized while
attending the London School of Economics, he had hoped to fight in Bosnia in
the 1990s but ended up instead with a Kashmiri militant group. Mohammed was
charged with organizing Pearl's kidnapping, but al Qaeda's operational
chief, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, allegedly killed the American journalist.

British-born Saajid Badat was another worshiper at Masri's Finsbury Park
mosque who went through the Afghan camps. Badat was a would-be shoe bomber,
who meant to blow himself up at the same time as Reid; he testified that he
changed his mind and dismantled his bomb. Convicted earlier this year, Badat
reportedly received orders from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

Extremists run the gamut
British authorities have broken up what they claimed were several different
cells with al Qaeda connections. One group, arrested in 2004, was accused of
storing a half-ton of ammonium nitrate, which can be used in explosives, in
a locker near Heathrow Airport. Another group was arrested in 2003 and
charged with plans to use the deadly poison ricin in an attack - although
only one man was convicted, not for manufacturing ricin but for killing a
British officer who came to arrest him.

A raid on an al Qaeda computer expert in Pakistan in 2004 led to arrests of
nearly a dozen men in Britain, including a Muslim convert of Indian origin,
who were accused of casing financial targets in Britain and the U.S. in
preparation for an attack.

The portrait of those arrested suggests the diverse mosaic of Islamic
extremists making London their home today, with few of those taken into
custody by the British since Sept. 11 conforming to the original al Qaeda
profile of Saudis and Egyptians. Instead, a review by The Washington Post of
nearly 62 cases of men arrested here found the largest group - 31 - to be
from North Africa, followed by 12 British citizens and seven Pakistanis.
Many were educated in British institutions and were middle class, though
some, such as radical clerics Masri and Qatada, collected welfare benefits.

An 'inevitable' attack
Until last week, whether London was a target of al Qaeda had been a source
of debate.

Some experts, like Scheuer, believed that bin Laden had long wanted to hit
the city, ever since the arrest of his aide, Fawwaz. Bin Laden blamed the
arrest publicly on "British Crusader hatred of Muslims" from his refuge at
the time in the southern Afghan city of Kandahar.

Other analysts, such as Simon, believed that, up until 2001, "Britain was
regarded as too valuable a staging area" for al Qaeda to attack.

But ever since, it has been a key target.

One of London's radical Islamic clerics, Syrian-born, Saudi exile Omar Bakri
Mohammed, openly spoke of the time when the city that gave him refuge back
in 1983 would be hit. "It's inevitable," Mohammed, well known for his
celebrations in honor of the Sept. 11 hijackers, told a Portuguese magazine
last year. Among the groups mobilizing for a strike was one calling itself
al Qaeda in Europe. It "has a great appeal for young Muslims," he said. "I
know that they are ready to launch a big operation."

In Finsbury Park, a ragged and lively neighborhood of new immigrants, a
moderate faction has now taken control of the red-brick mosque where Masri
once delivered his fire-breathing sermons. As worshipers arrived for prayers
on Friday, they passed beneath a banner advertising "A New Beginning for the
Mosque" and a "Better Community Image."

Mohammed Nusa, 18, loitered outside, talking about the bombings and the
backlash against Muslims he now feared. That backlash, in turn, may help the
Islamic radicals, Nusa said. He adamantly rejected Masri's ideology but
explained there are always a few among his friends who argue that "if
they're going to make us look like the enemy, we might as well be the
enemy."

Glasser reported from Washington. Staff researcher Julie Tate in Washington
contributed to this report.

C 2005 The Washington Post Company

 

C 2005 MSNBC.com

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8526208/

FAIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to