"What's rising in Iraq is the spectre of American defeat and Iraqi
chaos. We're are past the point when you could counter every article
of which you disapprove by summoning Austin Bayfrom the bullpen for a
positive spin, or seeking shelter in Winston Churchill's lion shadow,
or being warned over and over that "failure is not an option" (yes, it
is). We are past the point of listening to Joe Biden and others say we
need more troops on the ground and more international cooperation.
Neither cavalry is riding over the hill."

http://jameswolcott.com/archives/2005/07/sunday_bloody_s.php

Sunday Bloody Sunday
Posted by James Wolcott

For months the Couch Potato Pattons have been telling us loud and
clear that despite all the gloom-mongering, the US was doing better in
Iraq than the loathed MSM was letting Americans know (Rich Lowry even
was bold enough to issue a proclamation on the cover of the National
Review cover story claiming, "We're Winning"), that there was a wealth
of good news that was being deliberately unreported, and that our
soldiers knew the real story, saw truer and deeper into what was
happening than those elite editors in NY and DC vegetating behind
their computer screens. Michael Graham, a rightwing radio host who has
just returned with his fellow full mooners from the "Truth Tour" of
Iraq, brought home the gospel he had heard in that troubled land to
the readers of National Review Online.

"Again and again, from 'white-collar' soldiers working in the relative
safety of Camp Victory at the Baghdad airport to the "real" soldiers
patrolling Route Irish (a.k.a the 'Highway of Death'), I heard that
America and their Iraqi-army allies are winning the war against the
insurgents. I was told again and again by the soldiers themselves that
their (our) cause is just, the strategy is working, and the enemy they
fight represents evil itself.

"In other words, I heard things seldom heard on CBS or read in the
pages of the New York Times."

The Sunday pages of The New York Times must have brought Michael
Graham only further confirmation that what he heard over there is the
plain truth and what he reads over here is fancy hogwash. Denying the
enveloping disaster in Iraq is how he maintains his membership in the
marching band of useful idiots.

Here's what was on Page One.

"DEFYING U.S. EFFORTS, GUERILLAS IN IRAQ REFOCUS and STRENGTHEN"

By DEXTER FILKINS and DAVID S. CLOUD
Published: July 24, 2005
BAGHDAD, Iraq, July 23

"They just keep getting stronger.

"Despite months of assurances that their forces were on the wane, the
guerrillas and terrorists battling the American-backed enterprise here
appear to be growing more violent, more resilient and more
sophisticated than ever.

"After concentrating their efforts for two and a half years on driving
out the 138,000-plus American troops, the insurgents appear to be
shifting their focus to the political and sectarian polarization of
the country - apparently hoping to ignite a civil war - and to the
isolation of the Iraqi government abroad.

"And the insurgents are choosing their targets with greater precision,
and executing and dramatizing their attacks with more sophistication
than they have in the past."

Here's what was in The Week in Review.

"IF IT'S CIVIL WAR, DO WE KNOW IT?

"By JOHN F. BURNS
Published: July 24, 2005
BAGHDAD, Iraq

"...events are pointing more than ever to the possibility that the
nightmare could come true. Recent weeks have seen the insurgency reach
new heights of sustained brutality. The violence is ever more centered
on sectarian killings, with Sunni insurgents targeting hundreds of
Shiite and Kurdish civilians in suicide bombings. There are reports of
Shiite death squads, some with links to the interior ministry,
retaliating by abducting and killing Sunni clerics and community leaders.

The past 10 days have seen such a quickening of these killings,
particularly by the insurgents, that many Iraqis are saying that the
civil war has already begun."

And then there's this, which came in after the other stories were filed.

I'm going to type this very slowly and simply so that the Couch Potato
Pattons can understand what I'm saying, even though I don't expect
them to accept it.

What's rising in Iraq is the spectre of American defeat and Iraqi
chaos. We're are past the point when you could counter every article
of which you disapprove by summoning Austin Bayfrom the bullpen for a
positive spin, or seeking shelter in Winston Churchill's lion shadow,
or being warned over and over that "failure is not an option" (yes, it
is). We are past the point of listening to Joe Biden and others say we
need more troops on the ground and more international cooperation.
Neither cavalry is riding over the hill.

Where the warbloggers are actively denying the spectre of defeat, the
political talkshows are passively denying it. Today--Sunday--it was
all about the Supreme Court nominee and the Plame leak and not much
else. Understandable. But at what point will attention be paid to the
full enormity of what's unraveling in Iraq? Or will it be like global
warming, which Russert, Stephanopolous, Chris Wallace, and the rest
ignore altogether, as if waiting for heatstroke deaths to dot the
capital lawns before acknowledging something momentous is happening.
They're still waiting for the memo that'll verify what any fool can see.

07.24.05 8:20PM





--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to