Odd that the military option is not even examined...or perhaps, not so odd, considering this is the BBC. Bruce
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6499781.stm Options limited in Iran standoff By Paul Reynolds World affairs correspondent BBC News website The British government is still hoping that quiet diplomacy will get the release of the 15 sailors and marines captured by the Iranians, but its options are somewhat limited if Iran does not respond . It could create a lot of sound and fury but Iran is good at playing that game and the risk is that the Iranian government would simply exploit the incident for even longer. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a master of rhetoric and riposte. He has shown a ready defiance of the UN Security Council over Iran's enrichment of uranium. He thrives on a confrontation. According to author Mark Bowden - in his book "Guests of the Ayatollah" about the seizure of the US embassy in Tehran in 1979 - Mr Ahmadinejad was "one of the central players in the group that seized the embassy and held hostages." The American hostages were held for 444 days, initially as a bargaining tool for the exiled Shah, and released only on the day that President Jimmy Carter left office. Mr Carter was humiliated by the episode. 'Different phase' There has been talk in Iran, denied by the foreign ministry, that Iran is looking for the release of five of its officials detained by the Americans in Iraq and accused of being secret agents. The atmosphere is not conducive to compromise. It would get worse if the sailors were put on trial Part of President Carter's problem was that he sounded weak and the American public did not like that, though he argued that his priority was the safety of the captives. So Tony Blair might well ratchet up the language to sound tougher if this goes on. He has already said that the row will move to a "different phase" if there is no breakthrough. So what options are open to him? GPS data For a start he could release the data, from GPS satellite locators and radar traces, which should show where the British party was when it was taken. The British government insists that its personnel were inside Iraqi territorial waters at the time and not on the Iranian side as Iran claims. Data might not convince the Iranians but it might convince the rest of the world. In any event, the demarcation line is vague, so Iran might dispute any data. The line was supposed to have been laid down along the middle in a treaty in 1975 but this incident happened in the Gulf itself where the line peters out. In any event, the treaty was broken when Saddam Hussein invaded Iran across the same waterway, known to the Arabs as the Shatt al-Arab and to the Iranians as the Trivandrum, the River Armand. Louder voices Mr Blair could call on other countries to make stronger representations, on the grounds that the British were on the right side of the line and the right side of the law, acting under a UN resolution allowing for foreign forces to be in Iraq. The EU has already made a statement. A Russian or Chinese comment might be more helpful but both countries are reluctant to take sides. He could turn to the UN itself. The Iraqi government's request for the release of the detainees might also count as Iran has reasonably good relations with the Shia-dominated Iraqi government. Britain could expel Iranian diplomats and even break off relations. That, however, could be matched move for move and might leave the UK damagingly out of contacts with Iran over the larger issue of its nuclear activities. Domestic pressure Such measures might help satisfy domestic critics like The Times, whose editorial line is that the British government has been "pusillanimous". It wants a deadline set for a release and unspecified sanctions applied thereafter by the UK and its allies, including possibly the Iraqi government. But setting a deadline is unlikely to impress Iran. It is currently ignoring a UN deadline on enrichment. An apology by Britain might get the men and the woman released. The last time this happened, in 2004, the British personnel did say sorry on Iranian TV and were freed. To an extent this is out of Mr Blair's hands. The men, and woman, might indicate regret on their own initiative. It is unlikely that the British government would do so. Relations worse The reason for this is that things have soured with Iran since 2004. A new government is in power there and for the last 18 months the UK and the US have accused Iran, especially the Revolutionary Guards who detained the British sailors, of helping Shia guerrillas with bomb technology. The atmosphere therefore is not conducive to compromise. It would get worse if the sailors were put on trial. The best the British government can probably hope for is that in due course Iran will make its point and then make the release. The Jimmy Carter scenario is one that London does not want to think about. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
