You will find the group pattern language project interesting...
http://groupworksdeck.org
Chris
--
CHRIS CORRIGAN
Harvest Moon Consultants
Facilitation, Open Space Technology and process design
Check www.chriscorrigan.com for upcoming workshops, blog posts and free
resources.
On Oct
I don't think you need to be so qualified, Paul;
3.) All all statements are *positively* self limiting.
But then if I gather correctly, it's all a joke anyway.
So from that vantage point... what do we do now?
*John Baxter*
*CoCreate Adelaide Facilitator, Director of Realise consultancy*
Greetings Christine,
Thanks for your detailed reply. I must admit, I have no experience
whatsoever with doing quasi-public OST events arranged for guilds,
industry-associations and the like. I'm clueless!
As such, my opinion does not have much (if any) validity about those use
cases. I do
Not sure the differences you articulate have anything to do with public and
private, Daniel. It's about the different structures. I've seen very loose
corporate add-on events and very productive and long-lived action (spanning
years and continents) come from open public conferences. So id say
On 10/17/14 7:01 AM, John Baxter wrote:
I don't think you need to be so qualified, Paul;
3.) All all statements are /positively/ self limiting.
But then if I gather correctly, it's all a joke anyway.
So from that vantage point... what do we do now?
*/John Baxter/*
/CoCreate Adelaide
Hi Michael,
I hear you, saying:
I've seen very loose corporate add-on events
..and then I also hear you saying:
I've seen...very productive and long-lived action (spanning years and
continents) come from open public conferences.
I do not hear you saying this:
I've seen very loose
John,
Will you tell me more about your interest in pattern languages for use
in OST? Your question instantly made me think of the Group Works deck
that Chris recommended as well. It's a great set of patterns for working
with groups. A few weeks ago Tricia Chirumbole and I actually used this
The four preconditions of the swarm invitation from Swarmwise by Rick
Falkvinge. I find this oddly similar to the preconditions of Open Space.
1. Tangible: You need to post an outline of the goals you intend to
meet, when, and how.
2. Credible: After having presented your daring goal, you need
Hi Michael,
I'm confused now, and so I believe I am about to learn something new
here... I'll know by your answers to these questions:
What are the minimum essentials of Open Space structure? For example,
are the following elements necessary at all?
1. Sponsor
2. Theme
3. Invitation in
Dan said: “... in human systems, there is no such thing as self-organization,
whatsoever, unless and until respect is successfully sent, and successfully
received, by and between the members.”
Interesting idea... There is no question in my mind that respect is critical to
effective human
Reference Link:
http://newtechusa.net/agile/culture-technology-wants-to-be-free/
In researching Barcamp and Unconference formats, I discover that Barcamp
and Unconference came much later and are in fact direct derivatives of
Open Space, also known as Open Space Technology, as in Open Space
Daniel…
“Open Space Technology” was created and released into the world long before the
Creative Commons licenses were there to let everyone know that it is freely
usable, shareable, with non-attribution. People can remix it, sell it, create
commercial products from it, rebrand it, create
I get the concern for open source principles
However, on reading the 4 swarm thingsnot much like OS and setting out a
process that sounds cheesy at best, (deleted long winded reasons why it leaves
me cold...proving that it did)
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
Dear Chris,
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and feelings, about open source
licensing for culture technology, such as Open Space.
Kind Regards,
Daniel
On 10/17/14 3:42 PM, Chris Corrigan wrote:
Daniel…
“Open Space Technology” was created and released into the world long
before the
Hi Anne,
I join with you regarding the cheese.
What concerns me is summed up in my essay:
Any and all attempts to close what is open, through tricky licensing,
trademarks and the like.
Because culture technology wants to be free.
On 10/17/14 3:47 PM, anne.bennett8ac wrote:
I get the
it's not about minimum requirements for me, daniel. many of the things on
your list show up in most of the meetings/events i've facilitated, but it's
all very situation specific.
what i heard you saying earlier, and maybe i heard it wrong, was about
corporate/organization/private events that
Dan (and anybody else who cares) just for the record and whatever... From
the VERY BEGINNING, OST has been FREE for whomsoever. My (as the
originator, discoverer, whatever) only condition is that we share what we
have learned.
ho
Winter Address
7808 River Falls Drive
Potomac, MD
Underlining this. The Giving Conference, an open and public event in 2003 was
transformational for the few dozen people who were there and launched scores of
long term and sustained work that had a influence far beyond what we could have
imagined. It’s one of my best practice stories, and it
one of my favorite stories, too, chris. here's some of the detail, from my
website. some of the links might be dead, but the story is a good one.
and it was totally open, public. he (vancouver, bc) and i (chicago)
worked with a blogger in texas to set it up. we were about 40 people at
the
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20141017/153ceaf0/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:58:12 +1030
From: John Baxter via OSList oslist
You will find the group pattern language project interesting...
http://groupworksdeck.org
Chris
--
CHRIS CORRIGAN
Harvest Moon Consultants
Facilitation, Open Space Technology and process design
Check www.chriscorrigan.com for upcoming workshops, blog posts and free
resources.
On Oct
I don't think you need to be so qualified, Paul;
3.) All all statements are *positively* self limiting.
But then if I gather correctly, it's all a joke anyway.
So from that vantage point... what do we do now?
*John Baxter*
*CoCreate Adelaide Facilitator, Director of Realise consultancy*
Greetings Christine,
Thanks for your detailed reply. I must admit, I have no experience
whatsoever with doing quasi-public OST events arranged for guilds,
industry-associations and the like. I'm clueless!
As such, my opinion does not have much (if any) validity about those use
cases. I do
Not sure the differences you articulate have anything to do with public and
private, Daniel. It's about the different structures. I've seen very loose
corporate add-on events and very productive and long-lived action (spanning
years and continents) come from open public conferences. So id say
On 10/17/14 7:01 AM, John Baxter wrote:
I don't think you need to be so qualified, Paul;
3.) All all statements are /positively/ self limiting.
But then if I gather correctly, it's all a joke anyway.
So from that vantage point... what do we do now?
*/John Baxter/*
/CoCreate Adelaide
Hi Michael,
I hear you, saying:
I've seen very loose corporate add-on events
..and then I also hear you saying:
I've seen...very productive and long-lived action (spanning years and
continents) come from open public conferences.
I do not hear you saying this:
I've seen very loose
John,
Will you tell me more about your interest in pattern languages for use
in OST? Your question instantly made me think of the Group Works deck
that Chris recommended as well. It's a great set of patterns for working
with groups. A few weeks ago Tricia Chirumbole and I actually used this
The four preconditions of the swarm invitation from Swarmwise by Rick
Falkvinge. I find this oddly similar to the preconditions of Open Space.
1. Tangible: You need to post an outline of the goals you intend to
meet, when, and how.
2. Credible: After having presented your daring goal, you need
Hi Michael,
I'm confused now, and so I believe I am about to learn something new
here... I'll know by your answers to these questions:
What are the minimum essentials of Open Space structure? For example,
are the following elements necessary at all?
1. Sponsor
2. Theme
3. Invitation in
Dan said: “... in human systems, there is no such thing as self-organization,
whatsoever, unless and until respect is successfully sent, and successfully
received, by and between the members.”
Interesting idea... There is no question in my mind that respect is critical to
effective human
Reference Link:
http://newtechusa.net/agile/culture-technology-wants-to-be-free/
In researching Barcamp and Unconference formats, I discover that Barcamp
and Unconference came much later and are in fact direct derivatives of
Open Space, also known as Open Space Technology, as in Open Space
Daniel…
“Open Space Technology” was created and released into the world long before the
Creative Commons licenses were there to let everyone know that it is freely
usable, shareable, with non-attribution. People can remix it, sell it, create
commercial products from it, rebrand it, create
I get the concern for open source principles
However, on reading the 4 swarm thingsnot much like OS and setting out a
process that sounds cheesy at best, (deleted long winded reasons why it leaves
me cold...proving that it did)
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
Dear Chris,
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and feelings, about open source
licensing for culture technology, such as Open Space.
Kind Regards,
Daniel
On 10/17/14 3:42 PM, Chris Corrigan wrote:
Daniel…
“Open Space Technology” was created and released into the world long
before the
Hi Anne,
I join with you regarding the cheese.
What concerns me is summed up in my essay:
Any and all attempts to close what is open, through tricky licensing,
trademarks and the like.
Because culture technology wants to be free.
On 10/17/14 3:47 PM, anne.bennett8ac wrote:
I get the
it's not about minimum requirements for me, daniel. many of the things on
your list show up in most of the meetings/events i've facilitated, but it's
all very situation specific.
what i heard you saying earlier, and maybe i heard it wrong, was about
corporate/organization/private events that
Dan (and anybody else who cares) just for the record and whatever... From
the VERY BEGINNING, OST has been FREE for whomsoever. My (as the
originator, discoverer, whatever) only condition is that we share what we
have learned.
ho
Winter Address
7808 River Falls Drive
Potomac, MD
Underlining this. The Giving Conference, an open and public event in 2003 was
transformational for the few dozen people who were there and launched scores of
long term and sustained work that had a influence far beyond what we could have
imagined. It’s one of my best practice stories, and it
one of my favorite stories, too, chris. here's some of the detail, from my
website. some of the links might be dead, but the story is a good one.
and it was totally open, public. he (vancouver, bc) and i (chicago)
worked with a blogger in texas to set it up. we were about 40 people at
the
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20141017/153ceaf0/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:58:12 +1030
From: John Baxter via OSList oslist
You will find the group pattern language project interesting...
http://groupworksdeck.org
Chris
--
CHRIS CORRIGAN
Harvest Moon Consultants
Facilitation, Open Space Technology and process design
Check www.chriscorrigan.com for upcoming workshops, blog posts and free
resources.
On Oct
I don't think you need to be so qualified, Paul;
3.) All all statements are *positively* self limiting.
But then if I gather correctly, it's all a joke anyway.
So from that vantage point... what do we do now?
*John Baxter*
*CoCreate Adelaide Facilitator, Director of Realise consultancy*
Greetings Christine,
Thanks for your detailed reply. I must admit, I have no experience
whatsoever with doing quasi-public OST events arranged for guilds,
industry-associations and the like. I'm clueless!
As such, my opinion does not have much (if any) validity about those use
cases. I do
Not sure the differences you articulate have anything to do with public and
private, Daniel. It's about the different structures. I've seen very loose
corporate add-on events and very productive and long-lived action (spanning
years and continents) come from open public conferences. So id say
On 10/17/14 7:01 AM, John Baxter wrote:
I don't think you need to be so qualified, Paul;
3.) All all statements are /positively/ self limiting.
But then if I gather correctly, it's all a joke anyway.
So from that vantage point... what do we do now?
*/John Baxter/*
/CoCreate Adelaide
Hi Michael,
I hear you, saying:
I've seen very loose corporate add-on events
..and then I also hear you saying:
I've seen...very productive and long-lived action (spanning years and
continents) come from open public conferences.
I do not hear you saying this:
I've seen very loose
John,
Will you tell me more about your interest in pattern languages for use
in OST? Your question instantly made me think of the Group Works deck
that Chris recommended as well. It's a great set of patterns for working
with groups. A few weeks ago Tricia Chirumbole and I actually used this
The four preconditions of the swarm invitation from Swarmwise by Rick
Falkvinge. I find this oddly similar to the preconditions of Open Space.
1. Tangible: You need to post an outline of the goals you intend to
meet, when, and how.
2. Credible: After having presented your daring goal, you need
Hi Michael,
I'm confused now, and so I believe I am about to learn something new
here... I'll know by your answers to these questions:
What are the minimum essentials of Open Space structure? For example,
are the following elements necessary at all?
1. Sponsor
2. Theme
3. Invitation in
Dan said: “... in human systems, there is no such thing as self-organization,
whatsoever, unless and until respect is successfully sent, and successfully
received, by and between the members.”
Interesting idea... There is no question in my mind that respect is critical to
effective human
Reference Link:
http://newtechusa.net/agile/culture-technology-wants-to-be-free/
In researching Barcamp and Unconference formats, I discover that Barcamp
and Unconference came much later and are in fact direct derivatives of
Open Space, also known as Open Space Technology, as in Open Space
Daniel…
“Open Space Technology” was created and released into the world long before the
Creative Commons licenses were there to let everyone know that it is freely
usable, shareable, with non-attribution. People can remix it, sell it, create
commercial products from it, rebrand it, create
I get the concern for open source principles
However, on reading the 4 swarm thingsnot much like OS and setting out a
process that sounds cheesy at best, (deleted long winded reasons why it leaves
me cold...proving that it did)
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
Dear Chris,
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and feelings, about open source
licensing for culture technology, such as Open Space.
Kind Regards,
Daniel
On 10/17/14 3:42 PM, Chris Corrigan wrote:
Daniel…
“Open Space Technology” was created and released into the world long
before the
Hi Anne,
I join with you regarding the cheese.
What concerns me is summed up in my essay:
Any and all attempts to close what is open, through tricky licensing,
trademarks and the like.
Because culture technology wants to be free.
On 10/17/14 3:47 PM, anne.bennett8ac wrote:
I get the
it's not about minimum requirements for me, daniel. many of the things on
your list show up in most of the meetings/events i've facilitated, but it's
all very situation specific.
what i heard you saying earlier, and maybe i heard it wrong, was about
corporate/organization/private events that
Dan (and anybody else who cares) just for the record and whatever... From
the VERY BEGINNING, OST has been FREE for whomsoever. My (as the
originator, discoverer, whatever) only condition is that we share what we
have learned.
ho
Winter Address
7808 River Falls Drive
Potomac, MD
Underlining this. The Giving Conference, an open and public event in 2003 was
transformational for the few dozen people who were there and launched scores of
long term and sustained work that had a influence far beyond what we could have
imagined. It’s one of my best practice stories, and it
one of my favorite stories, too, chris. here's some of the detail, from my
website. some of the links might be dead, but the story is a good one.
and it was totally open, public. he (vancouver, bc) and i (chicago)
worked with a blogger in texas to set it up. we were about 40 people at
the
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/pipermail/oslist-openspacetech.org/attachments/20141017/153ceaf0/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:58:12 +1030
From: John Baxter via OSList oslist
60 matches
Mail list logo
