Dear Chris,
in your note from 31.01.2018 at 00:44 you wrote, referring to something
a Guru said:
"He believes that it’s useful for certain things in certain contexts and
not in others. On that we all agree, I would think."
Well, I neither agree or disagree. So its one person less than "we
No hard and fast rules for me on this. I play it by ear.
At times alone, at times others take the lead handing over the microphone,
at times two or three mikes at play.
Depends on the client, the group and whatever feels right in the moment.
What's important is that the contagious energy force
Thank you Michael
The theme so far has avoided the key issue being the fact we are part of a self
regulating system in what we have chosen to call open space. At the same time
we seemed to be focused on the event called open space rather than the
environment of our business. An open space
In the book Doughnut Economics they describe four possible ethical
principles for 21st century economist to consider. I really like the second
one:
“Respect autonomy in the communities that you serve by ensuring their
engagement and consent, while remaining ever aware of the inequalities and
<3<3<3<3<3
Bästa hälsningar
Eva P Svensson
EPS Human Invest AB
Co owner Genuine Contact Group Inc
"Verksamhetsutveckling genom människor skapar långsiktigt välmående företag och
organisationer"
Anåsbergsvägen 22, 439 34 ONSALA
Besöksadress; Norra Allégatan 8, Göteborg
Tfn: 0300-615 05,
Hey Daniel,
Daniel Mezick via OSList wrote:
> I am hearing this pointed criticism from some quarters: That OST
> actually encourages conflict-avoidance via the Law of 2 Feet.
Well, even if that were true (which I don't think it is): would it be a
bad thing? I would rather have "conflict
HI all,
When I remember :-) I use to say something like ”please return to your seat
after posting your topic because there may be more topics coming up that will
give you ideas of new topics to put up”
And as Thomas said when I sense that the energy for putting up topics is coming
to an end I
