great distinction, Michael...
seems like you are pointing out one of the key underlying distinctions...
are we welcoming all of whatever wants to emerge? or, only some of it...
and yes, Thomas, no more boring meetings!
*Rosa Zubizarreta*
*meet me at my DiaPraxis website
A chip off the old block that one. Like father like son.
Grinning, Suzanne
On Dec 13, 2015 9:28 PM, "Barry Owen via OSList" <
oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> wrote:
> That sounds a lot like BarCamp - or at least the version of BarCamp I've
> experienced.
>
> To take it further . . . When the
That sounds a lot like BarCamp - or at least the version of BarCamp I've
experienced.
To take it further . . . When the space is opened in the way you describe,
the "Openers of the Space" also might feel compelled to "Pre-Load" some of
the issues with designated "Facilitators" at pre-designated
Gunnarsson via OSList
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:20 PM
To: Michael Herman; World wide Open Space Technology email list
Subject: Re: [OSList] not quite open space
I like to argue that actually open the space in fact dose not take longer. An
the messy chaotic parallel working way where no one
last week i discovered a kind of Not Quite Open Space. (with my hat off
and a forwards bow to paul levy, who posted here a Most Remarkable and
totally unrelated Winnie-the-Pooh story last week.)
i've always understood that the whole point of opening space is to get All
The Issues That Matter up
I like to argue that actually open the space in fact dose not take longer.
An the messy chaotic parallel working way where no one has the total
editorial control over the topics posted is actually a faster way and dose
go smoother. While the way of working with the facilitator Censorship of
the
What comes to me: Having as equal access to the space as possible. Or at least
muuch beyond a 'normal' meeting.
By the way. FOR HOW LONG IS A NORMAL MEETING GOING TO CONTINUE TO BE
IMPRODICTIVE AND BORING??
Sorry I got upset :)
I am lucky to never attend 'normal meetings'
Gnight
Thomas
Skickat
