Dear Nick,
I am very appreciative of you writing openly on this list, after the
conversations that happened beforehand!
I went over to your document and made some comments on the process.
Found a sense of „this process needs to be controlled to have a good outcome“
at several places.
Since a
Exit, Voice, and Loyalty - Wikipedia
I love seeing this old book show up in Seth Godins blog check it out.
Sounds a lot like OST; considerations competing needs to voice or exit or
loyalty play on this dance of living open space
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exit,_Voice,_and_Loyalty
I read in the proceedings of the Great Open Space that there was an
experience not to replicate. I'll learn from that!
Jeff
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018, 8:46 AM paul levy via OSList <
oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> wrote:
> Nick
>
> For the very reason Harrison points to in his tale - the shenanigans
Brooks, the author of this article is a very thoughtful person -
"conservative" in a classical sense. I suspect he would not recognize the
words "Open Space" but I do believe he is coming to understand the reality.
Interesting.
Harrison
>From The New York Times:
The New Power Structure
New
Nick – One of the problems in calling what you do Open Space is that there are
a lot of people around the world who know the real thing. I am reminded of a
large gathering (500) that was billed as Open Space, but clearly wasn’t. A
participant stood up and loudly proclaimed “I don’t know what
Nick
For the very reason Harrison points to in his tale - the shenanigans and
confusion created by calling it open space, I recommend you call it Open
Space - if not the guy wouldn't have stood up and said what he said, and
did what he did. It was the right thing to happen and it led to the
