] För Michael M
Pannwitz via OSList
Skickat: den 17 september 2016 13:33
Till: Judy Gast <jg...@sympatico.ca>; World wide Open Space Technology email
list <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>; Williams, Birgitt
<birg...@dalarinternational.com>
Ämne: Re: [OSList] [GC] Time challenge - multi
Dear Judy,
in my practice I have always suggested to the sponsor (when that topic
came up) not to make promises regarding the support of any action that
arose out of the ost gathering... other than to provide for what I
called "Next Meeting(s)".
The Next Meeting, 3.5 hours (between 4 and 8
Well, just as I felt 17 yrs or so ago when I joined this community I am in awe
of the contributions I get. Mostly on list but also off list which is
appreciated but I do know many others would harvest gems from it too.
So keep 'em coming -'big and small'. As with the butterfly. You never know
Thomas,
I did a project many years ago to support a statewide conversation about the
arts in Washington state. We began with an all-day statewide Open Space,
followed by 16 3-hour Open Spaces in communities off many different sizes, and
ended with a second statewide conversation to set
To chime in here, I agree with Birgitt. The key to success is insuring that
there is a commitment to follow up through an officially sanctioned and
supported process and infrastructure. And as Michael has said an appropriate
communications plan so that everyone who wants to come knows the
Hi Thomas,
I see that you are hoping to use OST and yet not totally sure if it will be
your chosen method. I believe that OST is the only method that will be
sufficient for what you want to accomplish. It meets all the criteria for
when OST works best. The most important factor for me though, is
Hi Thomas,
Thanks so much for sharing and for your thoughts and questions. This project
just sounds really powerful and it’s good to hear how it continues.
I wanted to share a few thoughts from my experience working in communities who
feel for whatever reason, that 3 hours of Open Space is
