The original question referenced the OSM wiki about "complex intersections" at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Complex_intersections
My much preferred tagging, not for any specific data consumer like OsmAnd, is to "tag all incoming ways" as illustrated at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Tag_all_incoming_ways The fact that it might make it easier for a router like OsmAnd is nice but the real reason is that in reality you don't have to stop two or three traffic lights in the middle of an intersection and I think the "tag all incoming ways" better models reality. Curtis' tagging edits meet the intent of OSM, is documented in the wiki and is widely used. So I wonder if you actually read the link given before writing "Please don't". On Friday, July 26, 2019 at 3:39:45 AM UTC-7, CP wrote: > > > Op 25-07-19 om 21:26 schreef Curtis Brown: > > I have been moving traffic lights out out of these intersections, largely > for the reason brought up here: > > > Please don't, Curtis. Tagging is: > 1 - Describe what you physically see ("Hey, I see a sign" ) > 2 - Describe what it does ("Hmm, that makes it one way traffic" ) > > Moving traffic lights to come to the rescue of some bad router violates > both rules. > > Thanks, > CP > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/ab2331c2-d5a9-41b2-834a-7c74ce12d1ea%40googlegroups.com.
