Hi,
Being the one doing the "Please don't": I indeed have not read the wiki
lemmas you're referring to. I will definitely read up on that and
refrain from further lecturing before I've done that.
Thanks for the pointer. These kind of contributions keep us (me) awake
and are very useful.
The original question referenced the OSM wiki about "complex intersections"
at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Complex_intersections
My much preferred tagging, not for any specific data consumer like OsmAnd,
is to "tag all incoming ways" as illustrated
at
Thank you Greg and CP for reminding me about the principles of ground
truth. I understand you are supposed to tag what is on the ground, do not
map against Mapnik styles, etc., etc.. I have stopped my practice about
moving traffic lights. I'm sorry I didn't provide that detail.
My original
Op 25-07-19 om 21:26 schreef Curtis Brown:
I have been moving traffic lights out out of these intersections,
largely for the reason brought up here:
Please don't, Curtis. Tagging is:
1 - Describe what you physically see ("Hey, I see a sign" )
2 - Describe what it does ("Hmm, that makes it
Curtis Brown writes:
> I am genuinely curious to know from OsmAnd developers what their point of
> view is. Does OsmAnd's routing prefer traffic_lights moved out of
> intersecting nodes of dual-carriaged intersections, or does its routing
> treat a cluster of traffic_light'd nodes as a single
Hi everyone,
I want to ask about traffic lights in dual-carriaged intersections.
Sometimes the intersections have traffic_lights on the intersecting nodes
where the ways cross, and sometimes the lights are outside of the
intersecting nodes. Here are two examples of intersections and the
