Re: Howto save a computed track

2018-08-13 Thread Majka


On Monday, 13 August 2018 18:19:50 UTC+2, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> Computing long distance tracks take quite some time.
> Is it possible to save such a track for later usage? 
> If this isn't possible, yet, 
> please take this as a feature request.


When the route is completely computed, click on the row with the distance 
and time (not at the arrow on left, just the text itself). Then you can 
review it - and save as gpx as well. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Feature request: Adding support for "mooring=yes"

2018-08-13 Thread Otto Wyss
I've seen that support for "waterway=fairway" was added 
to rendering_types.xml by retagging as "seamark:type=fairway". Could this 
also done for "mooring=yes" to "seamark:type=mooring"? And maybe as well 
for "waterway=lock_gate" to "seamark:type=gate".

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Offline routing issues

2018-08-13 Thread Toby Dickenson
This turn restriction was added on August 05, so will be in the next map update

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8505820

On 13 August 2018 at 17:43, Martin Scharm  wrote:
> I updated the maps to the versions of August 1st. And indeed, the first
> issue is fixed.
>
> However, the second issue in Warsaw remains an unnecessary U-Turn..
> Does the OSM map data need to be modified there?
>
>
> On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 2:34:31 PM UTC+2, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Majka  wrote:
>> > I don't think so, unless the no_u_turn restriction is set there
>> > correctly.
>>
>> They are.
>> For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6267735
>>
>> That is why it will probably be solved by simply updating the offline map.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Osmand" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Offline routing issues

2018-08-13 Thread Poutnik the Wanderer
Only if OSM data reflects real traffic signs incorrectly, or correctly, but 
in obsolete, deprecated way.


Otherwise OSMAnd has to be changed.

--
Dne 13. srpna 2018 18:43:47 Martin Scharm  napsal:


[...]
However, the second issue in Warsaw remains an unnecessary U-Turn..
Does the OSM map data need to be modified there?




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Offline routing issues

2018-08-13 Thread Martin Scharm
I updated the maps to the versions of August 1st. And indeed, the first 
issue is fixed.

However, the second issue in Warsaw remains an unnecessary U-Turn..
Does the OSM map data need to be modified there?


On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 2:34:31 PM UTC+2, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Majka > 
> wrote: 
> > I don't think so, unless the no_u_turn restriction is set there 
> correctly. 
>
> They are. 
> For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6267735 
>
> That is why it will probably be solved by simply updating the offline map. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Howto save a computed track

2018-08-13 Thread Helmut Jarausch
Computing long distance tracks take quite some time.
Is it possible to save such a track for later usage? 
If this isn't possible, yet, 
please take this as a feature request. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Offline routing issues

2018-08-13 Thread Toby Dickenson
> sometimes the suggested route goes against all reason -
> making several sharp turns

Osmand doesnt account for turn angle. It doesnt know that a
right-angle turn is slower than going straight, or that a u-turn is
slower still.

https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/issues/5603

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


osmand 2.2 on ios very slow with contour lines activated

2018-08-13 Thread 'locke' via Osmand
hi
i'm using osmand 2.2 on my iphone se. as soon as i activate contour lines, 
maps rendering is very very slow. parts of the maps take 10-20 seconds to 
be displayed, while this only grid is shown.
also scrolling throug the map without zooming is very slow and stucks a 
lot. while driving position symbol is not mooving smoth, its jumping every 
20 or 50 m.
without contour lines rendering speed is much better
is this a bug?
other open street map based apps like pocket earth run very smoth on my 
phone, even with contour lines

if this problem would be fixed, osmand would be the perfect maps application
thanks
locke

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Offline routing issues

2018-08-13 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Majka  wrote:
> I don't think so, unless the no_u_turn restriction is set there correctly.

They are.
For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6267735

That is why it will probably be solved by simply updating the offline map.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Offline routing issues

2018-08-13 Thread Majka


On Monday, 13 August 2018 13:57:47 UTC+2, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Martin Scharm  > wrote: 
> > What needs maps with less than 25 days? Should I update my offline maps 
> and reproduce the error? 
>
> It seems that by just updating to the latest map version (August 1) 
> should solve your problem. 
>

I don't think so, unless the no_u_turn restriction is set there correctly. 
The issue and its correction did need newer map because it seems that the 
existing no_u_turn restriction wasn't propagated into the map itself, as 
far as I could understand it.

But the main problem (IMHO) still exists - for some reason, Osmand needs 
the no_u_turn restriction to avoid routing which doesn't make any sense by 
itself. I mean sometimes the suggested route goes against all reason - 
making several sharp turns and taking longer route instead of taking 
shorter, simpler one. Putting the missing no_u_turn restriction in the data 
doesn't solve the problem, it simply stops its occurrence  at one exact 
place where the correction is made and the problem will come later at 
another one. 
There has to be some other problem in the routing cost calculation - no way 
the suggested routing should come out "cheaper/faster" than the correct one 
- even allowing that the suggested route would be a valid/legal one.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Offline routing issues

2018-08-13 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Martin Scharm  wrote:
> What needs maps with less than 25 days? Should I update my offline maps and 
> reproduce the error?

It seems that by just updating to the latest map version (August 1)
should solve your problem.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Offline routing issues

2018-08-13 Thread Martin Scharm
What needs maps with less than 25 days? Should I update my offline maps and 
reproduce the error? 

On August 13, 2018 11:42:40 AM UTC, "Nelson A. de Oliveira"  
wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Martin Scharm 
>wrote:
>> However, we ran into three routing issues, when Osmand recommended
>strange
>> routes... (that were undoable or very dangerous). As OSM suggests
>better
>> routes, I assume this in an issue in Osmand..?
>
>Probably you hit this bug
>https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/issues/5645
>
>It needs maps created with less than ~25 days

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Offline routing issues

2018-08-13 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Martin Scharm  wrote:
> However, we ran into three routing issues, when Osmand recommended strange
> routes... (that were undoable or very dangerous). As OSM suggests better
> routes, I assume this in an issue in Osmand..?

Probably you hit this bug https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/issues/5645

It needs maps created with less than ~25 days

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: Offline routing issues

2018-08-13 Thread Martin Scharm
Btw. I downloaded the offline maps for Poland on July 1 2018.

On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 1:26:26 PM UTC+2, Martin Scharm wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> we've been using Osmand extensively during our holidays last month - and 
> it was super helpful! :)
>
> However, we ran into three routing issues, when Osmand recommended strange 
> routes... (that were undoable or very dangerous). As OSM suggests better 
> routes, I assume this in an issue in Osmand..?
> I tried to boil it down to the interesting junctions:
>
>
> The first one was right behind Usedom to continue at the coast of Poland. 
> It's basically between 53.9145, 14.4227 and 53.91319, 14.43458. This is the 
> route suggested by Osmand:
>
> As you can see, we are supposed to follow the E65 (instead of taking the 
> exit), and then make a U-turn to take the exit on the opposite lane.. This 
> is quite confusing and dangerous..
> OSM suggests a better route with the correct exit:
>
> Here is the link to the OSM route: https://osm.org/go/0NhkTdZJ
>
>
>
> The second issue was in Warsaw. Again, Osmand suggests an unecessary 
> U-turn on a main road:
>
> Not sure, why Osmand doens't leave the street in the correct direction and 
> instead does a U-turn..?
> OSM does it correctly: 
>
> Link to OSM route: https://osm.org/go/0Oy6dE34E--
>
>
> I don't really remember the precise location of the third issue, but it 
> was also an unexpected U-turn.. If it helps I can try to recall our trips..?
>
>
> I'm using Osmand~ 3.0.4 from F-Droid on a ShiftPhone 5 with offline maps.
> It is offline routing (car), Safe mode is off. I don't think I ever 
> changed any routing-settings. Nothing is avoided (ferry, tolls etc).
>
> Do you need any other information?
>
> Best wishes
> Martin
>
>
> And thanks a lot for that great tool, guys! That were just 3 minor issues 
> in thousands of kilometers with a camper :)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.