If that were so simple, there would the following extremely fast overall
algorithm:
Select a point in the "middle" and solve the two problems separately.
Now continue to do that recursively.
Episteme PROMENEUR schrieb am Fr., 27. März
2020, 19:30:
>
>
>
>>
>>
> After reading all posts I was a
>
>
After reading all posts I was a bit puzzled and disappointed then i had an
idea.
Osmand advises cutting in several routes of 250 km our itinerary, Right ?
Then I asked for Osmand to include their advice in their algorithm.
See
https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/issues/8721
--
You
OK - as a very minor correction.
Actually, the mainpage of the website links to google play, amazon and
apple app store (at the moment all with -50%).
So, as a matter of fact, the app is first put on the market to be sold, but
also on f droid (nightly builds are available as well, for the sake
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 08:12:37AM -0700, zanny wrote:
Last point - since Osmand is a sold product, users have the right to hardly
complain. "Implement your own solution" is a good answer only for
free-of-charge app
Minor correction. OsmAnd is free of charge in general, the "sale"
aspect on
P.S.: OSMand algorithm obviously can be optimized wrt speed, I and Harry
would agree on that, but it was chosen by purpose
and will never have the speed of contraction hierarchy ( or like )
algorithm speed.
And contraction hierarchy definitely is not for BRouter, as it's high
priority is
Hello gentlemen,
I am also a long time (and hence, satisfied) user of Osmand, since back in
2011.
Speed is (and has always been) an issue (you can check old discussion as
well) - I believe there full consensus on this.
I had never thought it is a matter of computational power: any 100$ mobile
In many areas, not limited to routing, speed can be also a weakness. Not
necessarily the speed itself, but things leading to high speed.
It is like a half-joke about software usability:
It can be free, easy, but not powerful.
It can be free, powerful, but not easy.
It can be powerful, easy, but
Hello! Thank you for the feedback.
Could you please provide screenshots and coordinates of the place so we can
test it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OsmAnd" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
Il giorno giovedì 26 marzo 2020 03:32:13 UTC+1, Poutnik ha scritto:
>
> Each group is superior to the other in what it is focused to. *Speed is
> both strength and weakness.*
>
Could you please elaborate on this? In which cases is speed a weakness?!?!
--
You received this message because
