Re: [osmosis-dev] Problem with 0.36

2010-09-13 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 13 Sep 2010, at 08:15, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > Brett Henderson wrote: >> I should read all of my emails before responding :-) > > And I should read the change logs before hunting a bug ;) Don't rush it with > the 0.37, I can live with using different versions for the different tasks

Re: [osmosis-dev] Problem with 0.36

2010-09-13 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Brett Henderson wrote: I should read all of my emails before responding :-) And I should read the change logs before hunting a bug ;) Don't rush it with the 0.37, I can live with using different versions for the different tasks I have to perform for now. Then again, I always thought I

Re: [osmosis-dev] Problem with 0.36

2010-09-13 Thread Brett Henderson
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > Frederik Ramm wrote: > >> I'll debug this further - currently unsure if there's something wrong with >> the input data or what. The problem occurs about 1h50m hours into processing >> the job. so it looks more like it is towards the

Re: [osmosis-dev] Problem with 0.36 (was: Re: [OSM-dev] Osmosis hourly replication broken?)

2010-09-13 Thread Brett Henderson
I've fixed that one in svn. Not many have run into it. From changes.txt: * Fixed a bug in --bounding-box and --bounding-polygon preventing use of clipIncompleteEntities after a --tee task. It's due to a tee task marking entities as read-only to avoid multiple threads modifying entities at the sa

Re: [osmosis-dev] Problem with 0.36

2010-09-12 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Frederik Ramm wrote: I'll debug this further - currently unsure if there's something wrong with the input data or what. The problem occurs about 1h50m hours into processing the job. so it looks more like it is towards the end. Ok, that was easy; it looks like clipIncompleteEntities is bro

[osmosis-dev] Problem with 0.36 (was: Re: [OSM-dev] Osmosis hourly replication broken?)

2010-09-12 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, moving this from dev to osmosis-dev: Frederik Ramm wrote: 0.36 seems to work. Anything prior, probably not. Then again hardly anyone uses the hourlies I guess. I'm seeing another problem, after upgrading to 0.36. It's not related to the diffs any more, these are fine; but my job that