Re: [OSPF] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse

2017-07-17 Thread Peter Psenak
Hi Shraddha, thanks for your comments. I believe all of them can be addressed by editorial changes and I'll be more then happy to work with you on those. More importantly, it looks to me you are not objecting the problem statement and the direction that the draft is taking to address it. Is my

Re: [OSPF] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse

2017-07-16 Thread Shraddha Hegde
OSPF WG, There has been a long debate on this draft, probably the most discussed in OSPF WG. The major contention point with this draft has been around 1. Definition of TE and Non-TE applications. The draft still uses the terminology of TE and non-TE applications without defining