Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for Hiding Transit-only Networks in OSPF - draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt

In case of p2mp networks, type 3 links used to describe the interface address is omitted to hide the network. This can cause problems in the next hop calculation in certain cases and in my opinion it is better to avoid installing a certain route (as done in case of broadcast networks in this

Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for Hiding Transit-only Networks in OSPF - draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt

[mailto:acee.lin...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 8:43 PM To: Shraddha Hegde Cc: OSPF List Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for Hiding Transit-only Networks in OSPF - draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-hiding-02.txt Hi Shraddha, You raise a very good point. On Feb 9, 2012, at 4:33

Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt

and OSPFv3 LSA or limit the | size to some maximum number of tags, e.g., 16? | | Thanks, | | Acee | | On Oct 21, 2013, at 7:05 AM, Shraddha Hegde wrote: | | | | Hi All, | | | | We have posted a draft on quot; Advertising per-node | administrative

Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag-00.txt

-Original Message- From: Acee Lindem [mailto:acee.lin...@ericsson.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 12:53 AM To: Shraddha Hegde Cc: Acee Lindem; Hannes Gredler; OSPF List; Rob Shakir; Harish Raghuveer Subject: Re: [OSPF] Review Request: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin

Re: [OSPF] draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-02

Hi Acee, Defining a new MRT sub TLV to be carried in the OSPFv2 Extended link TLV as defined in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions/ Router-Link TLVsas defined in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend looks to be a good

Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag

Dhruv, Thanks for detailed review and comments. Pls see in-line for the response. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 6:22 PM To: Acee Lindem (acee) Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] Poll

Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption poll for draft-zzhang-ospf-two-part-metric-05

Support. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Abhay Roy Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 12:33 PM To: ospf@ietf.org Subject: [OSPF] WG Adoption poll for draft-zzhang-ospf-two-part-metric-05 This document has seen some good discussions

Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-03

...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:39 PM To: Shraddha Hegde; draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org Cc: OSPF WG List Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-03 Shraddha, please see inline: On 12/2/14 17:50 , Shraddha Hegde wrote: Authors, Some

Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-03

. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:15 PM To: Shraddha Hegde; draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org Cc: OSPF WG List Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-03 Shraddha

[OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-03

Authors, When there are multiple parallel links between two nodes, it is useful to Group them into different bundles and use each bundle for load-balancing for different traffic flows. What we have in adjacency sid is just a flag to indicate that the label is a set label by setting a

Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-03

. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 4:08 PM To: Shraddha Hegde; draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org Cc: OSPF WG List Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-03 Shraddha

Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-03

Rob, Pls see inline.. -Original Message- From: rob.sha...@bt.com [mailto:rob.sha...@bt.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 10:11 PM To: Shraddha Hegde; ppse...@cisco.com; draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-segment

[OSPF] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

Authors, We have a backup flag in adjacency sid to indicate whether the label is protected or not. Similarly. I think we need a flag in prefix-sid as well to indicate whether the node-sid is to be protected or not. Any thoughts on this? Rgds Shraddha

Re: [OSPF] [Isis-wg] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

, December 29, 2014 1:35 PM To: Shraddha Hegde; draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org Cc: ospf@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions Shraddha, node-SID

Re: [OSPF] [Isis-wg] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

will either use prefix-sids with p flag on or off based on the need of the service. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 1:49 PM To: Shraddha Hegde; draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org; draft

Re: [OSPF] [Isis-wg] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

Peter, Pls see inline. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 2:02 PM To: Shraddha Hegde; draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org Cc

Re: [OSPF] [Isis-wg] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

today. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 2:26 PM To: Shraddha Hegde; draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org Cc: ospf@ietf.org; isis

Re: [OSPF] [Isis-wg] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

Rob, Pls see inline.. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Rob Shakir [mailto:r...@rob.sh] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 2:38 PM To: Peter Psenak; Shraddha Hegde Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi

Re: [OSPF] [Isis-wg] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

in the network Would result in disconnection and a retry for such services. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 4:35 PM To: Shraddha Hegde; draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis

Re: [OSPF] [Isis-wg] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

(ppsenak); Shraddha Hegde; draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org Cc: ospf@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Isis-wg] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions Peter - The requirement Shraddha

Re: [OSPF] [Isis-wg] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

: Monday, January 05, 2015 12:07 PM To: Pushpasis Sarkar; Shraddha Hegde; Peter Psenak (ppsenak); draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org; Hannes Gredler Cc: ospf@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [OSPF] [Isis-wg] Mail

Re: [OSPF] [Isis-wg] Mail regarding draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions

(ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 3:37 AM To: Pushpasis Sarkar; Shraddha Hegde; Peter Psenak (ppsenak); draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@tools.ietf.org Cc: ospf@ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org

Re: [OSPF] Link Overload references

Thanks Alvaro. Will take care of these. Rgds Shraddha From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aret...@cisco.com] Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 4:50 AM To: draft-hegde-ospf-link-overl...@tools.ietf.org Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Link Overload references Hi! Just a quick note to say that the

Re: [OSPF] Comments on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-00

Les, Thanks for the review and comments. Pls see in-line.. I have some comments in this draft. ---Introduction ---I think the last sentence should be removed. It is providing an example of a use case - and as such is more appropriate for Section 5. ---Also, node-tags are a

[OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02.txt

or significant process change from last version. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 2:09 PM To: Shraddha Hegde; Anton Smirnov; Anton Smirnov; Bruno Decraene; Zhenbin Li; Rob Shakir; Hannes Gredler

[OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft-hegde-rtgwg-virtual-multi-instance-00.txt

to interoperate. Kindly review and provide inputs and suggestions. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hegde-rtgwg-virtual-multi-instance/ Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shraddha Hegde Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 9:13 AM To: rt

Re: [OSPF] Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF - draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02 - IPR Poll

I am not aware of any IPR other than disclosed by Juniper. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 2:18 PM To: draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-...@tools.ietf.org Cc: OSPF WG List ospf@ietf.org

Re: [OSPF] IPR Poll on "OSPF Link Overload"

I am not aware of any IPR other than disclosed by juniper. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 5:46 AM To: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overl...@ietf.org Cc: OSPF WG List Subject: IPR Poll on "OSPF

Re: [OSPF] Alvaro's DISCUSS on OSPF Admin Tags

Hi Acee/Alia, Pls see inline.. From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 2:11 AM To: Alia Atlas <akat...@gmail.com> Cc: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>; OSPF ADs <ospf-...@tools.ietf.org> Subj

Re: [OSPF] Alvaro's DISCUSS on OSPF Admin Tags

Hi Alia/Acee, Do you suggest to remove the last paragraph in section 3.2.1 or remove the normative language? Rgds Shraddha From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 12:13 AM To: Alia Atlas <akat...@gmail.com>; Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@junipe

Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric : Max metric handling

be stated explicitly in the draft. Rgds Shraddha From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 5:36 AM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-met...@ietf.org Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-o

Re: [OSPF] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-06

tus for the full tag mechanism (e.g., to figure out what it'll be used for in practice, how and why) rather than Proposed Standard. This is major issue [1]. -Original Message- From: Black, David [mailto:david.bl...@emc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 4:41 AM To: Rob Shakir <

Re: [OSPF] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-06 - Editorial comments and nits

omments. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Black, David [mailto:david.bl...@emc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 8:20 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Rob Shakir <r...@rob.sh>; a...@cisco.com; bruno.decra...@orange.com; ops-...@ietf.org; General Area

Re: [OSPF] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: (with COMMENT)

Hi Stephen, Pls see inline.. -Original Message- From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 6:09 PM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-...@ietf.org; ospf-cha...@ietf.org; a...@cisco.com; ospf@ietf.org Subject:

Re: [OSPF] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

: Shraddha Hegde [mailto:shrad...@juniper.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 9:27 AM To: Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aret...@cisco.com>; The IESG <i...@ietf.org> Cc: Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.sheph..

Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric : Max metric handling

e 10 + 8fff +10+10+10 = 0x902f And the traffic would be diverted. Did I miss something? Or misunderstood the two-part metric? Rgds Shraddha From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 4:07 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; draft-ietf-ospf-two-p

Re: [OSPF] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

rate limiting for the LSA origination. Would like to hear others opinion on this. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aret...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 6:09 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; The IESG <i...@ietf.org&

Re: [OSPF] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alvaro, Thanks for reviewing the document. As indicated in other thread, we need rules/regulation on how to interpret the tags and how to use them to get interoperable implementations. > Although , the actual values of node admin tags do not need to be > standardized and is left to the

[OSPF] Regarding draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-00

Hi All, draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-00 proposes moving and/or copying TLVs from the TE Opaque LSA to the Extended Link Opaque LSA. The draft lists the problems that the draft is trying to solve. I have reproduced that list of problems below, with each problem followed by what I

[OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric : Max metric handling

Authors, As per my understanding of the draft, SPF calculation uses sum of metric from the interface cost and the network to router cost advertised by the neighbor. Handling of MAX metric is not described in the draft. Since the metric will be sum of 2 16 bit numbers it can exceed the normal

Re: [OSPF] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-06: [1] Operational Considerations

: Black, David [mailto:david.bl...@emc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 11:34 PM To: bruno.decra...@orange.com; Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net> Cc: a...@cisco.com; ospf@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; Rob Shakir <r...@rob.sh>; a...@cisco.com; ops-...@ietf.org; General Area Revi

[OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07.txt

Hi All, The below version contains updates to the Operations and Manageability comments received from David Black. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2015 12:24 AM To: Shraddha Hegde <sh

Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric : Max metric handling

operational Perspective it’s better to mention this point explicitly in the draft. Rgds Shraddha From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 3:03 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-met...@ietf.org Cc: OSPF WG List

Re: [OSPF] Alvaro's DISCUSS on OSPF Admin Tags

Ok. Rgds shraddha From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6:07 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Alia Atlas <akat...@gmail.com> Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>; OSPF ADs <ospf-...@tools.ietf.org> Subject: Re: [OSPF]

Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF - draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02

Acee, Agree with you that the interpretation should be that the node tags for certain router is the super set of all the tags from all node-admin tag TLVs from all instances of RI LSA advertised by that router. Will update the document. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: OSPF

Re: [OSPF] AD review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-04

Thanks Hannes. From: Hannes Gredler [mailto:han...@gredler.at] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:30 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net> Cc: Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; Alia Atlas <akat...@gmail.com>; OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ospf-node-ad

Re: [OSPF] OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01

Acee, Pls see inline.. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 5:18 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org> Cc: Pushpasis Sarkar <psar...@juniper.net>; H

Re: [OSPF] OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01

Acee, Thanks for picking up the draft for adoption. I believe this draft is very useful in automating the link upgrade process and software upgrade process in overlay deployments and hence support WG adoption as co-author. I would like to take this opportunity to discuss few of the points

[OSPF] FW: OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01

Resending to mailing list as I didn't see it delivered in last posting... Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Shraddha Hegde Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 10:43 AM To: 'Acee Lindem (acee)' <a...@cisco.com>; OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org> Cc: Pushpasis Sarkar <psar

Re: [OSPF] AD review of draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970bis-02

draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970...@ietf.org; Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net> Subject: Re: [OSPF] AD review of draft-ietf-ospf-rfc4970bis-02 Hi Alia, Shraddha, From: OSPF <ospf-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:ospf-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Alia Atlas <akat...@gmail.com<mail

Re: [OSPF] OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01

Acee, I am in the process of revising the draft. Will include details you mentioned. Rgds Shraddha From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 7:15 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Manav Bhatia <manavbha...@gmail.com> Cc: OSPF W

Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Call for "OSPF Stub Neighbors"

Hi, I have a few concerns on the necessity of this draft. 1. Necessity of protocol change The draft proposes to add the default route as part of router LSA but it is not clear why this is required. The draft in sec 5.2 vaguely talks about without clarifying the real issue "We are introducing

Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Minutes

I guess the below statement needs correction Abhay Roy: MRT draft has normative reference on link overload LSA which is stuck at the moment. Should be Abhay Roy: MRT draft has normative reference on "ospfv3 extended LSA" which is stuck at the moment. Abhay, can you confirm? Rgds

[OSPF] New version of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-02

All, New version of the draft "draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-02" was posted before IETF-96 And was also presented at Berlin. The latest changes include advertising the Link-overload sub-tlv in Link local scoped or Area scoped RI-LSA based on application scenario. Kindly review and provide

Re: [OSPF] "OSPF Link Overhead" - draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-01

Acee, If I understood your comment correctly, you are proposing that there are usecases for "link overload" feature Where only link local information flooding would suffice so that alternate should be provided in the document. I agree with you, will update the document and resubmit soon. Rgds

Re: [OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-03.txt

Hi Karsten, Pls see inline... -Original Message- From: Karsten Thomann [mailto:karsten_thom...@linfre.de] Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 10:51 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-osp

Re: [OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-03.txt

Karsten, Thank you very much for detailed review. Pls see inline.. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Karsten Thomann [mailto:karsten_thom...@linfre.de] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 1:31 AM To: ospf@ietf.org Cc: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net> Subject: Re: [OSPF] F

[OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-02

Acee/Abhay, The draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload has been presented multiple times in OSPF WG and is stable since last IETF. Authors believe it is ready for WG last call and would like to request the draft be moved further. Rgds Shraddha ___ OSPF

Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse

OSPF WG, draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse describes a problem statement that is relevant for non-RSVP applications that need to look into the TE attributes. I do not support the adoption of this draft as the solution described in the draft has below problems. 1. The solution proposes

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

filled and the draft refers to an existing standard on getting this remote interface id. This is the standard mechanism we follow in every draft. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 7:07 PM To: Shraddha Hegde

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

Hi Peter, Thanks for the detailed review. Pls see inline.. -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 1:38 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

there and deployed for so many years? Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Ketan Talaulikar Talaulikar (ketant) [mailto:ket...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 12:31 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; Acee Lindem <acee.lin...@gmai

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 4:02 AM To: Acee Lindem <acee.lin...@gmail.com>; Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net> Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt Hi Shraddha, The only non-editorial comment

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

Ketan, We do have traffic engineering applications that require link-overload functionality. Pls refer section 7.2. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Ketan Talaulikar Talaulikar (ketant) [mailto:ket...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 10:46 AM To: Shraddha Hegde <sh

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

Ketan, Pls see inline.. -Original Message- From: Ketan Talaulikar Talaulikar (ketant) [mailto:ket...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 10:06 AM To: Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; Acee Lindem <acee.lin...@gmail.com>; Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-07.txt

the two drafts also this draft is not contradicting RFC 5817. I'll add a reference to RFC 5817 for TE related processing. Rgds shraddha -Original Message- From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 2:34 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net&

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-07.txt

, do let me know. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:55 PM To: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <ppse...@cisco.com>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ket...@cisco.com>; Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>

Re: [OSPF] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse

OSPF WG, There has been a long debate on this draft, probably the most discussed in OSPF WG. The major contention point with this draft has been around 1. Definition of TE and Non-TE applications. The draft still uses the terminology of TE and non-TE applications without defining

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-07.txt

08 version. Thanks Shraddha -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 3:59 AM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <ppse...@cisco.com>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ket...@cisco.com> Cc: ospf@ie

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-05.txt

Acee, I am OK with changing the wording as you suggested. Will do it in next revision. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 7:35 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Acee Lindem <acee.lin...@

Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-06 - DR migration

Hi Alexander, The objective of this draft is to re-route the traffic from the link that is expected to undergo maintenance And the case of broadcast links is explained in sec 5.2 which achieves the objective. The case you described may be relevant for unplanned link-down events which is

Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-06 - DR migration

[mailto:alexander.okonni...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 3:33 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; draft-ietf-ospf-link-overl...@ietf.org; ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-06 - DR migration Hi Shraddha, For planned link maintenance there still could be t

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-13.txt

is advertising prefix reachability and is also generating the Extended Prefix TLV with the A-flag re-set for this prefix as described in section 2.1 of [RFC7684] then PHP MUST not be done" Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] S

Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-13.txt

s since we do not have many scenarios to list. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 2:46 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; internet-dra...@ietf.org; i-d-annou...@ietf.org Cc: ospf@ietf.org Subject: Re

Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement"

Acee, >Additionally, there is the undesirable side effect of TE LSAs resulting in >inclusion in the TE topology for multiple >implementations The testing results on 3 implementation shows that local/remote interface ID in TE Opaque LSA does not result into links getting included in TE

[OSPF] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-10.txt

Path First IGP WG of the IETF. Title : OSPF Link Overload Authors : Shraddha Hegde Pushpasis Sarkar Hannes Gredler Mohan Nanduri Luay Jalil Filename

[OSPF] Request for WG last call and Early IANA allocation for draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-09

Acee/Abhay, All the review comments received so far from working group have been addressed in the latest revision draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-09. Authors of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload would like to request for WG last call and also early code-point allocation from IANA. Rgds Shraddha

Re: [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11

How about “graceful-link-shutdown” ? Rgds Shraddha From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, January 5, 2018 6:50 PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Joel Halpern ; gen-...@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [OSPF] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Eric, Introduction section does have a brief description and refers to 7.1 for detailed description of the use case. Moving detailed use case description to introduction section will make it cluttered. Also there are other applications apart from 7.1 which also have a brief description in

Re: [OSPF] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-13: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro, Thanks for the review and comments. Pls see inline.. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 11:27 PM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overl...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem

Re: [OSPF] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-11

Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 11:31 PM To: Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.i...@gmail.com>; Bruno Decraene <bruno.decra...@orange.com> Cc: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; Ketan Talaulikar (k

Re: [OSPF] OSPF Link Overload (aka, Graceful Link Shutdown) MAX-TE-METRIC

Acee, Pls see inline.. From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 7:51 AM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net> Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org> Subject: OSPF Link Overload (aka, Graceful Link Shutdown) MAX-TE-METRIC Hi Shraddha, We noti

Re: [OSPF] Deborah Brungard's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Deborah/Alia, Thanks for the comments. We really need a TE metric that can be used as last resort metric. RFC 5817 is very clear that 0x is a last-resort metric. Probably prior to 5817, there were no clear statements on The metric 0x being usable metric and resulted in

Re: [OSPF] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-13: (with COMMENT)

Ketan, Thanks for comments. Pls see inline... -Original Message- From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) [mailto:ket...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 1:58 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com>; The IESG <i...@iet

Re: [OSPF] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-13

Tim, Thanks for the review and comments. Pls see inline for responses. -Original Message- From: Tim Chown [mailto:tim.ch...@jisc.ac.uk] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 8:25 PM To: ops-...@ietf.org Cc: ospf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org Subject: Opsdir telechat

Re: [OSPF] Ben Campbell's No Record on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-13: (with COMMENT)

Ben, Thanks for the review and comments. Added a few more details in security consideration which I'll be posting today. Pls check if it looks good. Thanks Shraddha -Original Message- From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 8:24 AM To: The IESG

Re: [OSPF] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-14: (with COMMENT)

Thanks for the review Benoit. I have addressed Tim's comments in -15 version. Will post it soon. Thanks Shraddha -Original Message- From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bcla...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 6:23 PM To: The IESG Cc:

Re: [OSPF] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-13: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro, You are right. The registration happened in the incorrect registry. I have corrected the problem in -15 version. Pls see inline. From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 9:54 PM To: Shraddha Hegde <shrad...@juniper.net>; The IESG <i...

Re: [OSPF] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-10

Hi Joel, Thanks for the detailed review and comments. Pls see inline for replies. Rgds Shraddha -Original Message- From: Joel Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com] Sent: Friday, December 22, 2017 5:04 AM To: gen-...@ietf.org Cc: ospf@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;

Re: [OSPF] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-9

Martin, Thanks for the detailed review and comments. I have added a new section 4.5 in -11 version on details of remote-ipv4 address and the need for it. If you are talking about some other missing details, pls provide specific information. Sometimes certain details seem trivial and well