...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 9:51 AM To: adr...@olddog.co.uk;
'Stephen Farrell'; 'The IESG' Cc: ospf@ietf.org;
ospf-cha...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-
extensions@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] Stephen Farrell's
No Objection
Hiya,
Thanks - fine answer to my not-quite-discuss.
Cheers,
S.
On 04/01/15 09:39, Adrian Farrel wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I'd like the authors and shepherd to pitch in, but...
- I'd have thought that these TLVs would be sent more often than
others, and that (if enormous amounts of money are
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
On 19/08/15 17:46, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 8/19/15, 11:51 AM, Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie wrote:
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
On 16/10/15 07:20, Shraddha Hegde wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Pls see inline..
>
> -Original Message- From: Stephen Farrell
> [mailto:stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015
> 6:09 PM To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> Cc:
> draft-ietf-ospf-nod
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
On 29/06/16 15:11, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> I think it would be undesirable for a middlebox to modify OSPF packets
> under any circumstances. I see no requirement for this and, if there were,
> transport of OSPFv3 over IPv4 doesn’t expand or contract the types of
> modifications that a middle
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
11 matches
Mail list logo
