Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-08 Thread Dee Sharpe
-Original Message- From: François Revol To: Discussion mailing list for developers of OSS Sent: Wed, Dec 8, 2010 10:55 am Subject: Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port Le 8 déc. 2010 à 17:46, Dee Sharpe a écrit : If the POSIX device file interface is the only major hurdle, then

Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-08 Thread François Revol
Le 8 déc. 2010 à 17:46, Dee Sharpe a écrit :If the POSIX device file interface is the only major hurdle, then I may not have much to worry about. The purpose of the port isn't to allow the porting of programs that already use OSS. It's to push OS/2 forward with modern soundcard support. I'm Indeed,

Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-08 Thread Dee Sharpe
inal Message- From: Hannu Savolainen To: Discussion mailing list for developers of OSS Sent: Wed, Dec 8, 2010 10:30 am Subject: Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port Hi, In addition to Haiku there is also a port for VxWorks (which may be bit incomplete). OSS is not bound to Poxix. H

Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-08 Thread Hannu Savolainen
Hi, In addition to Haiku there is also a port for VxWorks (which may be bit incomplete). OSS is not bound to Poxix. However the API depends on the Posix style device file interface (/dev/x and open/close/read/write/ioctl/etc). If this kind of interface is not available then applications may r

Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-02 Thread Dee Sharpe
On 12/2/2010 2:15 PM, François Revol wrote: > Except I don't think there are many of those drivers they legally ship > with ReactOS... Yeh, I doubt that they'd ship any of that kind of driver. I'm willing to bet that they'd expect people to just download the drivers from the hardware OEM's webs

Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-02 Thread François Revol
Le 2 déc. 2010 à 21:09, Dee Sharpe a écrit : > On 12/2/2010 10:47 AM, François Revol wrote: >> Interesting, maybe you could get around with the ReactOS people, I >> tried to get them interested too but they didn't do much yet... > > They're probably more interested in getting drivers already wr

Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-02 Thread Dee Sharpe
On 12/2/2010 11:04 AM, Clemens Ladisch wrote: > François Revol wrote: >> I recall reading about a port of ALSA to OS/2, this was a fake right ? > Looks real:. It's very real & it's been in use for quite awhile. Dee Sharpe People deserve more, from themselves & eac

Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-02 Thread Dee Sharpe
On 12/2/2010 10:47 AM, François Revol wrote: > Interesting, maybe you could get around with the ReactOS people, I > tried to get them interested too but they didn't do much yet... They're probably more interested in getting drivers already written for Windows to work correctly. I doubt they're i

Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-02 Thread François Revol
Le 2 déc. 2010 à 18:04, Clemens Ladisch a écrit : > François Revol wrote: >> I recall reading about a port of ALSA to OS/2, this was a fake right ? > > Looks real: . Ah so it somehow works. I'm wondering how much the spend on merging ALSA each time. OTH it seems

Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-02 Thread Clemens Ladisch
François Revol wrote: > I recall reading about a port of ALSA to OS/2, this was a fake right ? Looks real: . Regards, Clemens ___ oss-devel mailing list oss-devel@mailman.opensound.com http://mailman.opensound.com/mailma

Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-02 Thread François Revol
Le 2 déc. 2010 à 16:19, Dee Sharpe a écrit : > Yeh, I was doing the Syllable port, but that was spare time work. A job > opportunity has arisen that will give me post-army employment & one of the > subsystems that I'd like to bring to the table is OSS, for OS/2 - eComStation. Interesting, mayb

Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-02 Thread Dee Sharpe
Yeh, I was doing the Syllable port, but that was spare time work. A job opportunity has arisen that will give me post-army employment & one of the subsystems that I'd like to bring to the table is OSS, for OS/2 - eComStation. Dee Sharpe People deserve more, from themselves & each other! Sent f

Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-02 Thread François Revol
Hi, Le 2 déc. 2010 à 14:45, Dee Sharpe a écrit : > Does anyone ever tried to port OSS to another platform? I made a port to BeOS & Haiku, cf. http://revolf.free.fr/Alchimie-7/Alchimie7_OSS_Haiku.en.pdf and http://revolf.free.fr/FOSDEM/2010/FOSDEM2010_ALTOS_011_OSSv4_Haiku_Port.pdf I've got a re

Re: [oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-02 Thread Dee Sharpe
That was a horrible typo. I meant, "Does anyone know if someone has ever tried to port OSS to another (non-posix) platform? Dee Sharpe People deserve more, from themselves & each other! Sent from my iPhone On Dec 2, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Dee Sharpe wrote: > Does anyone ever tried to port OSS to

[oss-devel] Non- *nix/posix port

2010-12-02 Thread Dee Sharpe
Does anyone ever tried to port OSS to another platform? Dee Sharpe People deserve more, from themselves & each other! Sent from my iPhone On Dec 2, 2010, at 5:30 AM, wrote: > Hi! > > Is it possible to Faking/Emulating drivers/cards, so I can test my > GUI-mixer to see if the layout works we