Re: [ossec-list] OSSEC slack alerts for agents v2.9.0

2017-05-23 Thread Fredrik Hilmersson
Thanks everyone for the feedback and support. It all made sense and your comment did guide me to resolve it, wasn't any harder then updating the section and add agent ID, e.g.: ossec-slack local,AGENT.ID 7 Have a nice day and, Kind regards Fredrik Den tisdag

Re: [ossec-list] Re: Rule 510 is triggering events but logtest is not showing any rules that should be triggered

2017-05-23 Thread Gert Verhoog
I think I'm just really confused as to what "regex" and "match" are actually matching against. Given the following log event: 2017 May 24 12:38:16 (ci-runner__development_12.34.56.78) any->rootcheck File '/var/lib/docker/volumes/d758587e86d60a53043c93c1f730d6e04acdcb5f7a5a181182cfe0fb754aa293/_

Re: [ossec-list] Re: Rule 510 is triggering events but logtest is not showing any rules that should be triggered

2017-05-23 Thread Gert Verhoog
Unfortunately, it's still not working, and I'm not sure what else I can try... This is what I'm doing: The log entries that I want to ignore all look like this (from archives.log): 2017 May 24 12:38:16 (ci-runner__development_12.34.56.78) any->rootcheck File '/var/lib/docker/volumes/d758587e8

[ossec-list] Disable the ossec-agent for OS updates.

2017-05-23 Thread andrii . pravdyvyi
I am going to update my Linux servers and I tried to disable the ossec-agent for this time. I was the following workarounds: 1. stop agent on a host 2. run /var/ossec/bin/syscheck_control -u AGENT_ID 3. update 4. up agent But after start agent I got lots of trigger "new files in the server"

Re: [ossec-list] OSSEC slack alerts for agents v2.9.0

2017-05-23 Thread Jesus Linares
I see your point.. I thought you were talking about the *integratord*. I never tried it using AR, but in your active-response configuration I see: > local It means that OSSEC is going to execute the script in the agent that generated the event. So, you must to configure your slack script in ev

Re: [ossec-list] OSSEC slack alerts for agents v2.9.0

2017-05-23 Thread Fredrik Hilmersson
Hello again Jesus, As I did state, so we're not misunderstanding each other, I do not run the wazuh forked version, but the 2.9.0 OSSEC version. This is the configuration settings i've got: ossec-slack.sh SLACKUSER="ossec" CHANNEL="#channel" SITE="https://hooks.slack.com/services/..."; SOURC

Re: [ossec-list] OSSEC slack alerts for agents v2.9.0

2017-05-23 Thread Jesus Linares
Hi Fredrik, this is the flow: - The integrator reads the alerts from alerts*.log *filtering by *rule_id*, *level*, *group *or *event_location*. - It executes the script using the arguments *hook_url *and *api_key*. - The slack script send the alert to slack. Clarification: The host

Re: [ossec-list] OSSEC slack alerts for agents v2.9.0

2017-05-23 Thread Fredrik Hilmersson
Clarification: The host specific alerts are sent to slack but the agent alerts are being ignored. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ossec-list" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ossec-list

Re: [ossec-list] OSSEC slack alerts for agents v2.9.0

2017-05-23 Thread Fredrik Hilmersson
Hello and thanks Jesus, I've read the documentation, however I do not use the forked wazuh version of OSSEC so i'm not sure that the integrator applies? What I want to clarify regarding my issue, so I do not misunderstand the approach. The OSSEC server (host) is the one responsible for sending

Re: [ossec-list] Re: problems registering agents

2017-05-23 Thread Jesus Linares
Hi, I'm glad to hear that. Here some useful links: - Installation guide: https://documentation.wazuh.com/current/installation-guide/index.html - Authd guide: https://documentation.wazuh.com/current/user-manual/agents/registering-agents/register-agent-authd.html Regards. On Tuesda

Re: [ossec-list] Re: problems registering agents

2017-05-23 Thread Topper Bowers
Thank you! This is a huge help. The upgrade to 2.0 locally was painless *and* fixed my authd issues. Now to production. On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Jesus Linares wrote: > Hi, > > it is a known issue in that version (1.1.1). It is related with the > algorithm that assigns an agent ID. This i