From: Nadav Har'El
Committer: Nadav Har'El
Branch: master
header files: don't include
OSv's header files should include , not .
Not only do the ones without "api/" work just as well, the extra
"api/" is actually harmful: It means that if a user wants to compile
an application with the regula
From: Nadav Har'El
Committer: Nadav Har'El
Branch: master
- remove _KERNEL restriction
In , all of the osv::application:: API was hidden with a
'#ifdef _KERNEL', probably to avoid header file conflicts in applications
which include the normal Linux header files. I fixed these conflicts in
the
Patch enables debugging VMs on remote hosts.
When connecting to localhost on non-default port, a ':PORT' string
can be used. So almost no additonaly typing is requried.
Signed-off-by: Justin Cinkelj
---
scripts/loader.py | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/
The additional disk has to be second device on (virtio) bus,
as only /dev/vblk1 is tested for magic header.
See also 56c6195b252b127c7fe90cb9fa46c370b384b51a
Actual code provided by Gregor Berginc.
Signed-off-by: Justin Cinkelj
---
scripts/run.py | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(
On 01/30/2017 03:24 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Justin Cinkelj
mailto:justin.cink...@xlab.si>> wrote:
On 01/29/2017 10:03 AM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Justin Cinkelj
mailto:justin.cink...@xlab.si>> wrote:
The
In , all of the osv::application:: API was hidden with a
'#ifdef _KERNEL', probably to avoid header file conflicts in applications
which include the normal Linux header files. I fixed these conflicts in
the previous patch, so we no longer need this _KERNEL stuff. It means
that an application which
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Justin Cinkelj
wrote:
>
>
> Maybe there is one significant difference between osv_execve() befor/after
> Nadav's fixed it, and the code above.
> osv_execve() tried to set new thread id in the code executed inside that
> new thread. So new thread was (1) initialize
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Justin Cinkelj
wrote:
>
>
> On 01/29/2017 10:03 AM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Justin Cinkelj
> wrote:
>
>> The thread ID of thread running new app main() function is returned.
>>
>> I think this has the same bug we already solved i
On 01/30/2017 02:26 PM, Justin Cinkelj wrote:
On 01/29/2017 10:03 AM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Justin Cinkelj
mailto:justin.cink...@xlab.si>> wrote:
The thread ID of thread running new app main() function is returned.
Signed-off-by: Justin Cinkelj mail
OSv's header files should include , not .
Not only do the ones without "api/" work just as well, the extra
"api/" is actually harmful: It means that if a user wants to compile
an application with the regular Linux header files *and also secondly*
with OSv header files, the user might include Linux
On 01/29/2017 10:03 AM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Justin Cinkelj
mailto:justin.cink...@xlab.si>> wrote:
The thread ID of thread running new app main() function is returned.
Signed-off-by: Justin Cinkelj mailto:justin.cink...@xlab.si>>
---
core/app
11 matches
Mail list logo