Hi Geraldo, Thank you for the kind guidance. The FreeBSD should be the quickest path. I may take a try on providing the tap device first.
Best regards, Maxul 2018-04-28 7:38 GMT+08:00 Geraldo Netto <geraldone...@gmail.com>: > Hello Maxul, > > Waldek/Nadav might provide a more accurate information > but I don't think we have tap on OSv > which means we would need to port ourselves the implementation > I guess the easiest path is to borrow code from FreeBSD or any other > project with a permissive license (we cannot link GPL code on OSv) > and we probably need a Linux like API > > Maybe those quick references can help you: > https://github.com/LaKabane/libtuntap > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/tuntap.txt > > > Kind Regards, > > Geraldo Netto > Sapere Aude => Non dvcor, dvco > http://exdev.sf.net/ > > On 27 April 2018 at 12:40, <lmy2010...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I enjoy the performance benefit of OSv, especially the No SpinLock and >> Van Jacobson implementation. I wish to establish the OSv image into the >> real cloud. My target app is OpenVPN. I try porting it into the OSv. >> OpenVPN deals with a tap device provided by Linux. Does anyone have any >> idea how to solve this? >> >> Best, >> Maxul >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "OSv Development" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to osv-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OSv Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osv-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
