On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Waldek Kozaczuk
wrote:
> Also as I suggested in one of my older emails it might be worth to ponder
> the idea of changing the default from java-isolated to java-non-isolated as
> the former one requires java.beans package which does not exist in compact
> profiles
Also as I suggested in one of my older emails it might be worth to ponder
the idea of changing the default from java-isolated to java-non-isolated as
the former one requires java.beans package which does not exist in compact
profiles. Also java-isolated jar will not work in Java 9 without making
so
Please see my answers below:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> Hi, I committed this patch, but I also have a question below:
>
>
> --
> Nadav Har'El
> n...@scylladb.com
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Waldemar Kozaczuk
> wrote:
>
>> This patch addresses a build issue w
Hi, I committed this patch, but I also have a question below:
--
Nadav Har'El
n...@scylladb.com
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Waldemar Kozaczuk
wrote:
> This patch addresses a build issue where this build command would fail due
> to both jdk 7 and 8 included:
> scripts/build -j4 image=java-
This patch addresses a build issue where this build command would fail due to
both jdk 7 and 8 included:
scripts/build -j4 image=java-tests,openjdk8-fedora && scripts/test.py --name
java.*
Following build commands should work now:
scripts/build -j4 image=java-tests && scripts/test.py --name java