Re: [osv-dev] Re: [RFC] Remaining work to support OSv on firecracker

2019-02-11 Thread Waldek Kozaczuk
On Monday, February 11, 2019 at 3:54:39 AM UTC-5, Nadav Har'El wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:50 PM Waldek Kozaczuk > wrote: > >> This patch is not meant to be applied but it serves to illustrate what is >> left to make OSv boot on firecracker. As you can see it is not a daunting >>

Re: [osv-dev] Re: [RFC] Remaining work to support OSv on firecracker

2019-02-11 Thread Pekka Enberg
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:54 AM Nadav Har'El wrote: > Maybe you can even add to run.py a firecracker hypersor options, so if > someone just installs this hypervisor he can use run.py? > That's a very good idea! - Pekka -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [osv-dev] Re: [RFC] Remaining work to support OSv on firecracker

2019-02-11 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:50 PM Waldek Kozaczuk wrote: > This patch is not meant to be applied but it serves to illustrate what is > left to make OSv boot on firecracker. As you can see it is not a daunting > amount of work anymore given modern virtio is supported now. > > In am not sure in

[osv-dev] Re: [RFC] Remaining work to support OSv on firecracker

2019-02-10 Thread Waldek Kozaczuk
This patch is not meant to be applied but it serves to illustrate what is left to make OSv boot on firecracker. As you can see it is not a daunting amount of work anymore given modern virtio is supported now. In am not sure in what order we should implement the remaining work. Ideally every