subject:"ZFS implementation reasons and challenges in OSv"

Re: ZFS implementation reasons and challenges in OSv

2017-10-05 Thread Dor Laor

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Kaeyan Jones wrote: > Hi Dor, > > I very much agree that ZFS is the best filesystem one could adopt, huge > fan of it myself. Given the dependency on RAM for storage performance in > ZFS are there any adverse side effects to deployments of OSv

Re: ZFS implementation reasons and challenges in OSv

2017-10-05 Thread Kaeyan Jones

Hi Dor, I very much agree that ZFS is the best filesystem one could adopt, huge fan of it myself. Given the dependency on RAM for storage performance in ZFS are there any adverse side effects to deployments of OSv for bursty workloads, particularly I/O latency sensitive ones? Is OSv using the

Re: ZFS implementation reasons and challenges in OSv

2017-10-05 Thread Dor Laor

Hi Kaeyan, ZFS was and still is the best filesystem with a BSD license we could adopt. There is no problem with hardware control that we know about. Moreover, hypervisors do virtualize the hardware so you can have similar features in a VM (like multiqueue and NVMe) and even direct assignment.