Hi,
I am going to be sending proper "Next Release Proposal" email later this
week (or next) and "Librarization/Modularization" will be a key part of it.
Currently, OSv kernel provides quite a significant subset of the
functionality of some standard Linux libraries listed here -
Thank you for the response.
Yes, dynamic_percpu is perfect for my purpose.
However, I encountered another issue.
If I use dynamic_percpu with preempt-lock (I think it is very common
pattern), it abort due to assertion failed.
It seems lazy binding prevents preemption lock.
So, I had to add
>
> Hi,
>
> I think both 3 and 4 parts of your patches look good. But I guess it would
> not hurt if Nadav could scrutinize at them from C++ perspective as well.
>
> However, I am having a bit of trouble testing those. I do not think
> anything is wrong with your patches but possibly something
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:58 PM Waldek Kozaczuk
wrote:
>
> *ubuntu@ubuntu-rasp4*:*~*$ uname -a
>
> Linux ubuntu-rasp4 5.3.0-1025-raspi2 #27-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 8 08:32:04
> UTC 2020 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
>
> *ubuntu@ubuntu-rasp4*:*~*$ ./firecracker-v0.21.1-aarch64 --no-api --config
>
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 7:31 AM Rick Payne wrote:
>
> I think this is also related to 913.
Indeed! :-) I had a sense of deja-vu with this memset() loop, and dug up
the patch I wrote back then and just updated it.
> I'll try without my patch (which
> we've been having to use since then).
>
