Re: [RFC] Support firecracker

One more thing - our serial console is dreadfully slow (https://github.com/cloudius-systems/osv/issues/921). So I think even printing bootchart info slows things by 3-5 ms. Without bootchart the 17 ms number drops to 12-11 ms. On Saturday, January 5, 2019 at 10:32:18 PM UTC-5, Waldek Kozaczuk

Re: [RFC] Support firecracker

On Saturday, January 5, 2019 at 2:58:14 AM UTC-5, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 9:43 AM Waldek Kozaczuk > wrote: > >> Indeed I have come across some incompatibility issues. Mostly around >> configuration but nothing very fundamental. You can see in some of my >> comments.

Re: [RFC] Support firecracker

On Saturday, January 5, 2019 at 4:09:23 AM UTC-5, דור לאור wrote: > > Great stuff Waldek! Is unix socket the normal way to pass parameters for > Firecracker? > I think so. There is also experimental vsock interface but I am not familiar with it and not sure what purpose of it would be

Build failed in Jenkins: osv-build-nightly #1708

See -- [...truncated 139.08 KB...] Adding /usr/lib/jvm/java/jre/lib/zi/America/Lima... Adding /usr/lib/jvm/java/jre/lib/management/jmxremote.password.template... Adding

Re: [RFC] Support firecracker

Great stuff Waldek! Is unix socket the normal way to pass parameters for Firecracker? How's the boot speed vs Qemu? On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 12:03 AM Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 9:58 AM Pekka Enberg wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 9:43 AM Waldek Kozaczuk >> wrote:

Re: [RFC] Support firecracker

On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 9:58 AM Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 9:43 AM Waldek Kozaczuk > wrote: > >> Indeed I have come across some incompatibility issues. Mostly around >> configuration but nothing very fundamental. You can see in some of my >> comments. >> > > Right, I missed