Re: [osv-dev] Performance of ffmpeg

Old time ffmpeg hacker here -- please remember that ffmpeg has a pretty convoluted build system that will disable accelerations (used to do it even silently) if the environment is not setup quite right. So... in order for this to be apples-to-apples it kind of needs to be the same ELF. Thanks,

Re: [osv-dev] Re: Pip packages/using Nix

So is this getting published some place? ;-) Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:00 AM Matthew Kenigsberg < matthewkenigsb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for putting so much effort into figuring that out! Really > appreciate it, and glad to get it working! > > On Wednesday, December 9,

Re: [osv-dev] Re: Pip packages/using Nix

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 8:03 AM Waldek Kozaczuk wrote: > > Hey, > > Send a patch with a new app that could demonstrate it, please, if you can. I > would like to see it. Sounds like a nice improvement. FWIW: I'd love to see it too -- been meaning to play with Nix and this gives me a perfect

Re: [osv-dev] Next releases - 0.56 and onward - proposal

This is such an impressive list! Would love to see it all! Thanks, Roman. On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 9:45 AM Waldek Kozaczuk wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a list of things, not necessarily in any importance order, I am > proposing we try to accomplish for next releases: > > Prune the list of issues >

Re: [osv-dev] OSv boots and runs simple hello world on Firecracker ARM edition ... on Raspberry PI 4

This is super awesome, Waldek! I'm now inspired to run OSv as a VM backed by Firecracker on Project EVE/RPi! ;-) Btw, can you share your osv-config.json and also details of what version of Firecracker you used? Better yet -- if there's a github repo with all the bits and pieces required to

Re: [osv-dev] OSv dockerfile

This is pretty sweet! Can this be added to the official OSv repo as well? Thanks, Roman. On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:04 AM Waldek Kozaczuk wrote: > Hi, > > As part of the effort to upgrade OpenSSL, in order to test the changes, I > have created a couple of Docker files allowing to create full OSv

Re: [osv-dev] OSv Linux compatibility

Well, there's that whole "you need to convert your a.out into a.so" thing -- so I guess it is kind of a porting On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 11:23 AM Waldek Kozaczuk wrote: > > I came across another unikernels-overview-type-of-writeup project on github - >

Re: [osv-dev] Does OSv have its own scheduler?

FWIW: KVM is a type-2 hypervisor, Xen (and ACRN and a few others) are type-1. Both have advantages and disadvantages. For example, a type-2 hypervisor is very difficult to tune for running RT OSes while ACRN (and even Xen lately -- especially on ARM) do it with no sweat. Thanks, Roman. On Mon,

Re: Next (0.53.0 and onwards) OSv releases roadmap proposal

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:26 AM Geraldo Netto wrote: > > Hello Roman/Friends, > > Roman, I'm having the freedom to share this message with the list once I'm > not an expert in gvisor > Actually, the idea is not to integrate gvisor, but instead take the list of > implemented syscalls and check

Re: Next (0.53.0 and onwards) OSv releases roadmap proposal

I've got to say: this is a really awesome list! On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:54 AM Waldek Kozaczuk wrote: > > This is somewhat revised version of the roadmap I sent couple of months ago. > I think that the main premise of it which I wrote in the original version > still stands: > > "In my

Re: About OSv support for docker image using 9pfs

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:36 AM Waldek Kozaczuk wrote: > > If anyone is interested I have created an issue that describes what it would > take to > implement v9fs - https://github.com/cloudius-systems/osv/issues/1008. It does > not > seem to be difficult nor a big effort but based on what I

Re: About OSv support for docker image using 9pfs

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 5:42 PM, Qixuan Wu wrote: > > > 在 2018年9月21日星期五 UTC+8下午1:11:40，Roman Shaposhnik写道： >> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Qixuan Wu wrote: >> > >> > >> > 在 2018年9月21日星期五 UTC+8上午1:59:50，Roman Shaposhnik写道： >> >

Re: About OSv support for docker image using 9pfs

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Qixuan Wu wrote: > > > 在 2018年9月21日星期五 UTC+8上午1:59:50，Roman Shaposhnik写道： >> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:10 AM, Qixuan Wu wrote: >> > >> > >> > 在 2018年9月19日星期三 UTC+8下午12:44:54，Roman Shaposhnik写道： >> >

Re: About OSv support for docker image using 9pfs

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:10 AM, Qixuan Wu wrote: > > > 在 2018年9月19日星期三 UTC+8下午12:44:54，Roman Shaposhnik写道： >> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Qixuan Wu wrote: >> > >> > >> > 在 2018年9月19日星期三 UTC+8上午10:00:36，Roman Shaposhnik写道： >> >

Re: About OSv support for docker image using 9pfs

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Qixuan Wu wrote: > > > 在 2018年9月19日星期三 UTC+8上午10:00:36，Roman Shaposhnik写道： >> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Qixuan Wu wrote: >> > >> > >> > 在 2018年9月19日星期三 UTC+8上午5:56:58，Nadav Har'El写道： >> >> &g

Re: About OSv support for docker image using 9pfs

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Qixuan Wu wrote: > > > 在 2018年9月19日星期三 UTC+8上午5:56:58，Nadav Har'El写道： >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Qixuan Wu wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>>We have some requirement to support standard docker OCI image. >>> >>>Currently OSv did not support

Re: Twitter handle

Are we there yet? ;-) Still getting "Sorry, that page doesn’t exist!" On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Waldek Kozaczuk wrote: > Funny story! I have just entered OSv birth date (12/1/2012 per 1st git > commit) as Twitter suggested. And the account got locked because OSv is > under 13 years old

Re: LinuxKit from Docker

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Waldek Kozaczuk wrote: > Nadav, > > Thanks for your reply. My post was supposed to be thought provoking :-) > > Please find my specific comments below. > > Regards, > Waldek > > On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 5:10:59 PM UTC-4, Nadav Har'El

Re: [RFC] aarch64: basic Xen support

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 2:51 AM, 'Sergiy Kibrik' via OSv Development <osv-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote: > hi Roman, > > On 01/20/2017 06:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >> this is super cool -- I've been very interested in seeing resurrected >> support for

Re: [RFC] aarch64: basic Xen support

Hi Sergiy! this is super cool -- I've been very interested in seeing resurrected support for OSv on Xen/ARM for a different project I'm working on. Would love to take a look at your code. Speaking of which -- did you forget to attach a patch or a link to your GH repo? The only link I see is the

Re: Problems in sendfile?

On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Avi Kivity <a...@scylladb.com> wrote: > On 12/04/2016 04:00 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >> sendfile is a pretty Linux-centric API and I'm sure it isn't implemented >> by OSv. > > > OSv aims to be Linux compatible, a

Re: Problems in sendfile?

sendfile is a pretty Linux-centric API and I'm sure it isn't implemented by OSv. Given that this is erlang and it must support platforms that don't have sendfile(2) I suggest you look into how to build it for POSIX (as opposed to Linux) environment Thanks, Roman. On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 5:06 PM,

Re: ScyllaDB on OSv?

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 08/12/2016 08:23 PM, Waldek Kozaczuk wrote: >> >> Given that ScyllaDB uses seastar that can run on OSv is it possible to run >> ScyllaDB on OSv? I have not found anything on scyllaDB site ? >> >> If no are there any plans