[otb-users] Moving from CLI to C++

Hi, I am using the CLI or the python for some time mainly for classification & segmentation. I would like to implement a C program and to include the OTB functionality. Is the CLI programs such as mean-shift segmentation are ready to be used as C source program ? Ofer -- -- Check the OTB

Re: [otb-users] Adapt OTB wavelet transform to ITK

To answer point 2), I agree! Regards Grégoire Mercier - Mail original - > De: "Michel Julien" > À: otb-users@googlegroups.com > Envoyé: Vendredi 20 Mai 2016 10:31:35 > Objet: RE: [otb-users] Adapt OTB wavelet transform to ITK > I see no objection that a

RE: [otb-users] Adapt OTB wavelet transform to ITK

I see no objection that a generic function of OTB migrate to ITK. We already did such contributions by the past and after all, we benefit a lot from ITK in OTB, so it is just paying back. However, I am concerned about 2 things : 1) What would be very bad is to duplicate code between ITK

Re: [otb-users] Adapt OTB wavelet transform to ITK

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Pablo Hernandez wrote: > Hello! I am looking for implementation of wavelet transform in c++, and > found your nice code about it. > > I wonder if it is possibly to adapt and submit your wavelet approach to > ITK, ITK license is not GPL

RE: [otb-users] Adapt OTB wavelet transform to ITK

Ok, I think point 1) should be discussed with OTB PSC (move thread to otb-developers), to see how to best do the code migration. Regards, Julien De : otb-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:otb-users@googlegroups.com] De la part de Grégoire MERCIER Envoyé : vendredi 20 mai 2016 10:39 À :

Re: [otb-users] Moving from CLI to C++

Hi, What you're asking is not clear to me : - the mail title said "moving to C++" but the content is about C - do you want to have a unique executable doing meanshift segmentation (instead of the current pair : application launcher + dynamic module) ? - is