[otb-users] Re: ERROR: Missing mandatory parameter: vec 0 (otbcli_PolygonClassStatistics.bat)

Merci Manuel c'est OK !! Le mardi 25 octobre 2016 14:27:09 UTC+2, michel M a écrit : > > > hi > > I have a problem with the command > $ > /d/orfeo/OTB-5.6.1-win32/OTB-5.6.1-win32/bin/otbcli_PolygonClassStatistics.bat > > -in alldate.tif -field code –vec traintest.shp -out training_stats.xml

Re: [otb-users] have the command of the gui interface

Thanks. It's already listed in the wiki in the application wishlist: https://wiki.orfeo-toolbox.org/index.php/Wishlist#General Regards, 2016-10-25 14:45 GMT+02:00 michel M : > Hi !, > it's possible to have the command mand when you are in gui command, > that's will be

[otb-users] Error otbcli_ImageClassifier (floating-point vector with ..)

Hello , I have an error on the command classifier otbcli_ImageClassifier.bat -in alldates2014_landsat_bandes_et_nvdi.TIF -out classif.tif uint8 -model model.rf i replaced uint8 by float but the result is the same 2016 Oct 26 09:35:21 : Application.logger (INFO) Loading model 2016

RE: [otb-users] Re: [Tutorial] How to compile, and use remote modules (or any OTB app) in QGIS?

Hello Bruno, It sounds like the cmake command failed. Can you try it again in a clean directory and post the output? Victor Poughon De : otb-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:otb-users@googlegroups.com] De la part de Bruno Granger Envoyé : lundi 24 octobre 2016 01:40 À : otb-users Objet :

RE: [otb-users] Re: exercice corrigé (training.shp et testing.shp)

That’s correct. Note that testing and training are both labelled polygons. You are free to decide which is which, but a 70/30 % split is a typical choice in machine learning. Victor Poughon De : otb-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:otb-users@googlegroups.com] De la part de Bruno Granger Envoyé

[otb-users] Re: exercice corrigé (training.shp et testing.shp)

Thanks victor but for me it's not again clear ... For exemple I have a shape file with data source corine land cover , i have a crop code , a label and a geometry I put 70% of records in a testing file and 30% of others records in a training file and after i don't understand the mécanism

[otb-users] OTB on XEON CPU

Hi we have some performance problems moving our OTB installation from i5 CPU to XEON CPU. meanshift segmentation works very slow on the XEON . Does the OTB have some issues with the XEON CPU (perhaps with the virtual core technology?) -- -- Check the OTB FAQ at

RE:[otb-users] Re: exercice corrigé (training.shp et testing.shp)

No worries! You could also use 100% of labels for training. Of course this means that you cannot do the testing step. The testing is there to evaluate the performance and quality of learned model. It is mostly used when developing new method, or tuning some parameters. It is not required if

RE:[otb-users] Re: exercice corrigé (training.shp et testing.shp)

Also note that it's usually: 70% for training 30% for testing (and not the other way around) Victor Poughon De : otb-users@googlegroups.com [otb-users@googlegroups.com] de la part de Poughon Victor [victor.poug...@cnes.fr] Envoyé : mercredi 26 octobre 2016 15:48