On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:10:19PM -0800, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
> 2017-01-25 20:31 GMT-08:00 Ben Pfaff :
> > This missing directive caused groff warnings and probably some erroneous
> > output too.
> >
> > Fixes: 96fee5e0a2a0 ("ovs-fields: New manpage to document Open vSwitch
2017-01-25 20:31 GMT-08:00 Ben Pfaff :
> This missing directive caused groff warnings and probably some erroneous
> output too.
>
> Fixes: 96fee5e0a2a0 ("ovs-fields: New manpage to document Open vSwitch and
> OpenFlow fields.")
> Reported-by: Daniele Di Proietto
This missing directive caused groff warnings and probably some erroneous
output too.
Fixes: 96fee5e0a2a0 ("ovs-fields: New manpage to document Open vSwitch and
OpenFlow fields.")
Reported-by: Daniele Di Proietto
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
On 25/01/2017 00:01, "Ansis Atteka" wrote:
>
>
>On Jan 25, 2017 4:22 AM, "Daniele Di Proietto" wrote:
>
>Current SELinux policy in RHEL and Fedora doesn't allow the creation of
>TAP devices.
>
>A tap device is used by dpif-netdev to create
It's difficult to make groff portably accept non-ASCII characters. It's
easier to replace them by groff escapes for the same characters, which
this commit does.
Fixes: 96fee5e0a2a0 ("ovs-fields: New manpage to document Open vSwitch and
OpenFlow fields.")
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
Also, IMO this series is good to go to the branch-2.7 as well.
Jarno
> On Jan 25, 2017, at 2:54 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> With a few remarks below,
>
> Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme >
>
>> On Jan 24, 2017, at 9:57 PM, Pravin B Shelar
With a few remarks below,
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 24, 2017, at 9:57 PM, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
>
> OVS router is basically partial copy of linux kernel FIB.
> kernel routing table uses skb-mark along with usual routing
> parameters. Following patch
With one correction below,
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Jan 24, 2017, at 9:57 PM, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
>
> Today packet mark action is broken for Tunnel ports with
> tunnel monitoring. User can write a flow to set pkt-mark for
> any tunnel traffic, but
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:13:15PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
> > On Jan 24, 2017, at 5:11 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
> >
> > This was a lot of work. Thanks for doing it!
> >
> > --Justin
>
> Whoops!
>
> Acked-by: Justin Pettit
Thanks. I applied these
[ View in browser ]( http://r.newsletter.bonescamail.nl/nru6r04eoatrf.html
)
[ ]( http://r.newsletter.bonescamail.nl/2n3cr00h9aoatrd.html )
Special offers meat and poultry :
Turkeytails / Putenschwanz / Kalkoenstaart / Croupions de Dinde 10 kilo - 10
box € 0,65 per kilo!!
Hi,
Would you be interested in Targeted “*Sugar CRM”* leads? We are happy to
provide the database across globe, specifically *North America, EMEA, APAC*
and *Latin America*.
We also have other users like *Salesforce CRM, Nimble, PipelineDeals,
Pipedrive, Hubspot CRM, Workbooks, Zoho CRM,
Before the meeting will start.
Have made some [1] documentation for ODL and [2] few patch sets with rpc
implementation of openflow bundles extension.
[1]
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:Bundles_extension_support
[2]
Thanks, get it.
On 2017/1/25 16:30, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Dong Jun > wrote:
Hi
I learned about the distributed dnat_and_snat. Now I don't see
what's the manner of sending GARP for distributed
Cancelling for 26th Jan. Next meeting 9th Feb.
thanks,
Kevin.
On 12/13/2016 05:47 PM, ktray...@redhat.com wrote:
> You have been invited to the following event.
>
> Title: OVS-DPDK bi-weekly meeting
> Hi All,
>
> At the OVS-DPDK Meetup after the OVS conference, it was suggested to
> have a
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Dong Jun wrote:
> Hi
>
> I learned about the distributed dnat_and_snat. Now I don't see what's
> the manner of sending GARP for distributed dnat_and_snat IP. In the past,
> we set nat_addresses column in lsp that connected to gateway lrp.
Hi
I learned about the distributed dnat_and_snat. Now I don't see
what's the manner of sending GARP for distributed dnat_and_snat IP. In
the past, we set nat_addresses column in lsp that connected to gateway
lrp. Now the type of lrp was changed from l3gateway to patch, does this
affect
On Jan 25, 2017 4:22 AM, "Daniele Di Proietto"
wrote:
Current SELinux policy in RHEL and Fedora doesn't allow the creation of
TAP devices.
A tap device is used by dpif-netdev to create internal devices.
Without this patch, adding any bridge backed by the userspace
17 matches
Mail list logo