On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 13:19 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:41:01AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 10:03 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 09:05:41AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 10:47 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:41:01AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 10:03 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 09:05:41AM -0700, Greg Rose wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 10:47 -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > Commit 618a5b45ae8b ("rhel: Avoid logrotate error if
>
On 4/16/17, 8:03 AM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> On 04/14/2017 07:36 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 18:44:44 +0200
>> Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
>>> index 07f89b037681..95a71546e8f2
On 4/16/17 8:40 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
> Johannes or anybody else working on it?
> i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
> so we can return meaningful messages
> example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
> taking it as a param
> For things that
Large numbers of interfaces would not cause deep nesting, only large
messages.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 02:36:57PM +0800, 网络尖兵 wrote:
> Thanks for you reply!
> This problem occurred when I was running OpenSwitch on my embedded system. As
> you know, the OpenSwitch use OVS as its control-plane.
On 04/14/2017 07:36 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 18:44:44 +0200
> Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
>> index 07f89b037681..95a71546e8f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
>> +++
On 04/14/2017 07:27 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 04/14/2017 07:44 PM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>
>> * Multicast addresses are never valid as local address
>> * Link-local IPv6 unicast addresses may only be used as remote when the
>> local address is link-local as well
>> * Don't allow
On 4/16/17 8:48 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> Excellent. His patches seem to be in. Seems
> commit ce07183282975026716107d36fd3f5f93de76668
> is a good point?
yes. will send later today.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
On 17-04-16 10:45 AM, David Ahern wrote:
On 4/16/17 8:40 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
Johannes or anybody else working on it?
i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
so we can return meaningful messages
example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
taking
On 4/16/17 8:40 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
> Johannes or anybody else working on it?
> i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
> so we can return meaningful messages
> example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
> taking it as a param
I have a patch
Johannes or anybody else working on it?
i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
so we can return meaningful messages
example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
taking it as a param
For things that call netlink_ack it may be easier if they create
the
Thanks for you reply!
This problem occurred when I was running OpenSwitch on my embedded system. As
you know, the OpenSwitch use OVS as its control-plane. And It have much more
configurations. For example, there are more than one hundred interfaces. When
your program monitor this kind of
12 matches
Mail list logo