On 1/14/2020 11:53 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 09.01.2020 08:46, Eli Britstein wrote:
>> From: Ophir Munk
>>
>> In case a flow is HW offloaded, packets do not reach the SW, thus not
>> counted for statistics. Use netdev flow get API in order to update the
>> statistics of flows by the HW
Hi Numan,
Please see my answers inline:
On 1/13/20, 11:37 PM, "Numan Siddique" wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 6:31 AM Manoj Sharma
wrote:
>
> Thank you for the review Numan.
>
> On 1/8/20, 11:14 PM, "Numan Siddique" wrote:
>
> Hi Manoj,
>
>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:11 AM taoyunxi...@cmss.chinamobile.com <
taoyunxi...@cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Han,
>Thank you for your patience in answering my questions. I agree
with your comments.
>I am interested in "specifying uuid when creating a row is
not yet
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:24 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> The commit message doesn't make much sense to me. The external-ids are
> set outside of ovn-controller, so the concept of them being handled in
> "the same iteration" or "the next one" only works if ovn-controller is
> setting them at some
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the review!
In fact, if cfg was NULL, this function would never have a chance to set
probe interval, because before setting the interval it would have already
crashed, at this line:
int interval = smap_get_int(>external_ids,
So, the behavior change of this patch is only
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 09.01.2020 15:44, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > Abbreviated as TSO, TCP Segmentation Offload is a feature which enables
> > the network stack to delegate the TCP segmentation to the NIC reducing
> > the per packet CPU overhead.
> >
>
On 09.01.2020 08:46, Eli Britstein wrote:
> From: Ophir Munk
>
> In case a flow is HW offloaded, packets do not reach the SW, thus not
> counted for statistics. Use netdev flow get API in order to update the
> statistics of flows by the HW statistics.
>
> Co-authored-by: Eli Britstein
>
Hi Han.
This patch introduces a small behavior change in the case where cfg is
NULL. In the earlier version, we would always set the probe interval on
the southbound database. With this version of the patch, we exit early
when cfg is NULL and do not set the probe interval.
On 1/13/20 5:52
The commit message doesn't make much sense to me. The external-ids are
set outside of ovn-controller, so the concept of them being handled in
"the same iteration" or "the next one" only works if ovn-controller is
setting them at some point in the loop.
Couldn't this have a negative effect on
--
Dear Sir,
We are Located in the united kingdom, the famous brand John Lewis PLC, is
UK's largest multi-channel retailer with over 45 shops furnished with
European products. We are looking for new products to attract new customers
and also retain our existing ones, create new partnerships with
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 09:30:17PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> If output device is not yet added to netdev-offload, netdev_ports_get()
> will not find it leading to NULL pointer dereference inside
> netdev_get_inindex().
>
> Fixes: 8f283af89298 ("netdev-tc-offloads: Implement netdev flow put
If output device is not yet added to netdev-offload, netdev_ports_get()
will not find it leading to NULL pointer dereference inside
netdev_get_inindex().
Fixes: 8f283af89298 ("netdev-tc-offloads: Implement netdev flow put using tc
interface")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
---
Please lets make joint business
I am, Dr. Salifou Sambo a bank auditor, I am in-charge of transferring
out funds or my village, which our village generates from the sales of
our local mined gold. I have some
left over fund in the bank here that I alone is aware of, and want to
transfer it out.
My
On 14.01.2020 16:41, Emma Finn wrote:
> Modified ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-flows command to output
> the miniflow bits for a given flow when -m option is passed.
>
> $ ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-flows -m
>
> Signed-off-by: Emma Finn
>
> ---
>
> RFC -> v1
>
> * Changed revision from RFC to v1
> *
I don't understand that claim. Which name column do you think we can
delete, from which schema?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 05:14:44PM +0800, taoyunupt wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>It will be appreciated，if you give more explanation for the resaon
> to summit this patch. In my opinion, it makes
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 07:09:36PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 13.01.2020 19:03, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > These functions failed to build on OS X because MSG_WAITFORONE is not
> > defined there. There are pitfalls for trying to define our own MSG_*
> > constants, since it's hard to pick a
On 13.01.2020 19:03, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> These functions failed to build on OS X because MSG_WAITFORONE is not
> defined there. There are pitfalls for trying to define our own MSG_*
> constants, since it's hard to pick a constant that is not used by the
> system already. Because OVS only uses
On 09.01.2020 15:44, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> Abbreviated as TSO, TCP Segmentation Offload is a feature which enables
> the network stack to delegate the TCP segmentation to the NIC reducing
> the per packet CPU overhead.
>
> A guest using vhostuser interface with TSO enabled can send TCP packets
On 1/14/2020 4:21 PM, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 14 Jan 2020, at 16:21, Stokes, Ian wrote:
On 1/14/2020 2:13 PM, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 14 Jan 2020, at 12:23, Stokes, Ian wrote:
On 1/13/2020 8:32 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
Hi Eelco, I'm seeing a crash in OVS while running this with
On 14 Jan 2020, at 16:21, Stokes, Ian wrote:
On 1/14/2020 2:13 PM, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 14 Jan 2020, at 12:23, Stokes, Ian wrote:
On 1/13/2020 8:32 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
Hi Eelco, I'm seeing a crash in OVS while running this with just a
port and a default queue 0 (phy to phy
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 03:41:57PM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>
>
> On 1/9/2020 2:44 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > Abbreviated as TSO, TCP Segmentation Offload is a feature which enables
> > the network stack to delegate the TCP segmentation to the NIC reducing
> > the per packet CPU overhead.
>
This patch adds support for multi-queue QoS to the DPDK datapath. Most of
the code is based on an earlier patch from a patchset sent out by
zhaozhanxu. The patch was titled "[ovs-dev, v2, 1/4] netdev-dpdk.c: Support
the multi-queue QoS configuration for dpdk datapath"
Co-authored-by: zhaozhanxu
netdev-dpdk: Add new DPDK RFC 4115 egress policer
This patch adds a new policer to the DPDK datapath based on RFC 4115's
Two-Rate, Three-Color marker. It's a two-level hierarchical policer
which first does a color-blind marking of the traffic at the queue
level, followed by a color-aware marking
This patch adds a new policer to the DPDK datapath based on RFC 4115's
Two-Rate, Three-Color marker. It's a two-level hierarchical policer
which first does a color-blind marking of the traffic at the queue
level, followed by a color-aware marking at the port level. At the end
traffic marked as
On 14 Jan 2020, at 12:57, Neil Horman wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 09:35:33AM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
Hey Eelco,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 4:57 PM Eelco Chaudron
wrote:
[snip]
diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
index 128963f..3f164c8 100644
--- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
On 1/9/2020 2:44 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
Abbreviated as TSO, TCP Segmentation Offload is a feature which enables
the network stack to delegate the TCP segmentation to the NIC reducing
the per packet CPU overhead.
A guest using vhostuser interface with TSO enabled can send TCP packets
much
Modified ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-flows command to output
the miniflow bits for a given flow when -m option is passed.
$ ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-flows -m
Signed-off-by: Emma Finn
---
RFC -> v1
* Changed revision from RFC to v1
* Reformatted based on comments
* Fixed same classifier being dumped
On 1/14/2020 2:13 PM, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 14 Jan 2020, at 12:23, Stokes, Ian wrote:
On 1/13/2020 8:32 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
Hi Eelco, I'm seeing a crash in OVS while running this with just a
port and a default queue 0 (phy to phy setup). It seems related to the
call to
On 14 Jan 2020, at 12:23, Stokes, Ian wrote:
On 1/13/2020 8:32 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
Hi Eelco, I'm seeing a crash in OVS while running this with just a
port and a default queue 0 (phy to phy setup). It seems related to the
call to rte_meter_trtcm_rfc4115_color_blind_check. I've
l3_ofs should be set all Ethernet packets, not just IPv4/IPv6 ones.
For example for ARP over VLAN tagged packets, it may cause wrong
processing like in changing the VLAN ID action. Fix it.
Fixes: aab96ec4d81e ("dpif-netdev: retrieve flow directly from the flow mark")
Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 09:35:33AM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> Hey Eelco,
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 4:57 PM Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> [snip]
> > diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> > index 128963f..3f164c8 100644
> > --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> > +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> > @@
On 14 Jan 2020, at 12:23, Stokes, Ian wrote:
On 1/13/2020 8:32 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
On 1/13/2020 3:56 PM, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
This patch adds a new policer to the DPDK datapath based on RFC
4115's
Two-Rate, Three-Color marker. It's a two-level hierarchical policer
which first does a
On 1/13/2020 8:32 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
On 1/13/2020 3:56 PM, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
This patch adds a new policer to the DPDK datapath based on RFC 4115's
Two-Rate, Three-Color marker. It's a two-level hierarchical policer
which first does a color-blind marking of the traffic at the queue
Introduce IPv6 Prefix delegation state machine according to RFC 3633
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3633.
Add handle_dhcpv6_reply controller action to parse advertise/reply from
IPv6 delegation server. Advertise/reply are parsed running respectively:
- pinctrl_parse_dhcv6_advt
-
Introduce logical flows in ovn router pipeline in order to parse dhcpv6
advertise/reply from IPv6 prefix delegation router.
Do not overwrite ipv6_ra_pd_list info in options column of SB port_binding
table written by ovn-controller
Introduce ipv6_prefix column in NB Logical_router_port table to
Introduce IPv6 Prefix delegation state machine according to RFC 3633
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3633.
Add handle_dhcpv6_reply controller action to parse advertise/reply from
IPv6 delegation server.
Introduce logical flows in ovn router pipeline in order to parse dhcpv6
advertise/reply from
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 06:50:50PM +0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 6:03 PM Simon Horman
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 05:28:04PM +0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 7:06 PM Simon Horman
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: John
Hi Han,
Thank you for your patience in answering my questions. I agree with
your comments.
I am interested in "specifying uuid when creating a row is not yet
supported by the ctl tools", I will try to summit patch to support it . Do you
have some sugesstion?
> -Original Message-
> From: David Marchand
> Sent: Monday 13 January 2020 15:58
> To: Loftus, Ciara
> Cc: ovs dev ; Flavio Leitner ;
> Stokes, Ian
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] Documentation: add notes for TSO & i40e
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 4:49 PM Ciara Loftus wrote:
> >
>
Hey Eelco,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 4:57 PM Eelco Chaudron wrote:
[snip]
> diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> index 128963f..3f164c8 100644
> --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,10 @@
> #include
> #include
>
> +/* The below is needed as
>
> Thanks for the new feature.
>
> Please add an item to NEWS.
>
> OVS is currently in "soft freeze" for the next release. We should fork
> for the next release at the end of the week. Therefore, please resubmit
> your patch next week.
Thanks Ben. Sure I will post new patch after fork is
41 matches
Mail list logo
